Posted on 01/23/2014 12:42:27 PM PST by Kevmo
Validation of Electrical Power Generation by Second - Generation CIHT Technology
Valuator:
K.V. Ramanujachary
Professor
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry
Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ, 08096
Submitted to the BlackLight Power Corporation
Evaluators Signature:
Date : _ N ovember, 2011 __
2 BLACKLIGHT POWER ( BLP )
CIHT CELL VALIDATION (November 2011)
The present report deals with the studies aimed at validating several second generation CIHT (Catalyst - Induced - Hydrino - Transition) cells that were assembled at the BLP facility. In contrast to th e first generation cells, BLP has identified a novel proprietary electrolyte consisting of earth - abundant and eco - friendly chemicals.
All t ests were performed at BlackLight Power, Inc. at their Cranbury, NJ laboratories . The primary focus of the vali dation is to analyze the net electrical production from proprietary CIHT cells using the hydrogen fuel from water and supply it to the electrochemical reaction .
The electrical output was corrected for highest energy possible for any known conventional e lectrochemical reactions based on the initial and final analysis of the cell contents. The electrical energy balances were performed with multiple state - of - the - art battery testing systems (Arbin BT 2000) that were calibrated to high accuracy (<0.1% error) at the factory and confirmed using a digital oscilloscope at BLP. The net electrical energy gain determined in this manner for many different systems, configurations, and modes of operation were 162%, 340%, 385%, 167%, 195%, 456%, 735%, 182%, 151%, 425% and 186%.
Typically, steady electrical power was continuously measured from the cell for more than a week and up to more than 30 days before the cell was stopped and the cell contents were analyzed by a cascade of characterization tools . These tests wer e necessary for an accurate determination of potential chemical change s . Controls were processed under the same protocol and analyzed using the same analytical instruments in triplicate. Measurements included weight change of the active electrode (anode) and any compositional change of the electrolyte by compositional analysis using ICP, XRF and XRD.
Special systems were run with controlled mass flow to rule out the possibility of hypothetical conventional energy contributions . ‘
“Hydrino” pro duct was identified by the presence of an up field - shifted NMR peak characteristic of reduced - radius (lower - energy) hydrogen. Each CIHT cell comprised a set of metal electrodes and an ionically conductive electrolyte. W ater supplied as vapor to the cell or extracted from air , from which hydrogen was generated by electrolysis , appears to be the source of electric energy output . Due to the electrochemistry occurring in the cell, an electric current flowed through a load of the electrical testing inst rument with an internal ion flow of the electrolyte completing the electric circuit. The mechanism of operation appears to involve specific chemicals of the electrolyte that formed the catalyst and atomic hydrogen during electron and ion flow needed for t he production of electricity. The excess electricity observed was consistent with the electrochemical production of low - energy form of hydrogen providing the energy source.
Indeed, the electrical energy out surpassed by multiples the electricity required to generate the hydrogen fuel from water .
The cell was continuously regenerative and operated at constant power output for extended periods . The mass and energy balance s were performed on each cell. The electrode at which the electrical power was devel oped (anode) was weighed to rule out the possibility of any reaction that could give rise to excess electrical energy observed in the present CIHT cells. The electrolyte was also carefully analyzed by elemental analysis. Controls comprised the same start ing compositions and treatments as the electrical - power - producing anodes and electrolytes.
The cell used nontoxic , earth - abundant commodity chemicals, and the system operating conditions were similar to those of exi s ting technologies such as batte ries and fuel cells . However , the stand - alone generation of electricity from water reported here is truly exceptional . The confirmatory electrical and analytical data and analysis is available upon request.
Some link you want lurkers to go to?
None of you skeptopaths ever go to my links, so what’s the point. We just wait until someone who’s posted as stupidly as you so we can record it for posterity.
HBomb as an example of CHF. Just an amazing level of stupidity. Thanks.
All Rossi, all the time.
***Asked & Answered
————————www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg89054.html-————————
Yes, your lies suck.
***You’re accusing a fellow freeper of being a liar? DEFEND your claim, A$$#0/e.
LOL!
your lies suck.
***My lies? What about yours? What about the HUNDREDs of UNANSWERED questions from you skeptopaths? All you engage in is Hostility and JumpingOnTheBandwagon. No DOUBT, posterity will find you culpable in this.
Yes. You said I claimed..... HBombs were an example of CHF
Where? Liar.
Absafrickinlutely. You’re the one who pushed such a position. LOL!!!! for posterity, LOL!!!! Thank you SO MUCH for posting what you have. It warms my heart.
Where?
***Upthread, numbnuts. And now I have saved this thread for others so that when the mods delete it, in order to save face for you, it will still be around for others to see just how foolish you and other skeptopaths are. Thank you so much.
On this very thread.
What about yours?
You mean where I lied about 1000 times as much energy as any chemical reaction? Oops, that was you.
No DOUBT, posterity will find you culpable in this.
Culpable? Oh no! Culpable in what? Making fun of your scientific idiocy?
***Upthread, numbnuts.
Awesome! Which post?
Well, now, Mr. HBomb-as-an-example-of-CHF, we shall see. Thank you so, so much for your ridiculous skeptopathic interactions on this thread.
Truly, Thanks 4 Bumping The Thread T4BTT.
PTSIFOM. Classic skeptopathy. Do your own fetching, mud-for-brains.
Look at post #19, Right, because no one has ever seen useful amounts of energy produced by fusion.
No mention of control. I never mentioned CHF, that was you.
Your post #28, There is nothing controlled nor useful about an H-Bomb. It is UNcontrolled.
Of course H-Bombs are controlled, the fusion isn't.
Damn, you're a doofus.
Kevmoron indeed.
I never said H-Bombs were CHF.
***Bwahahahahah.... who’s backtracking now? Posterity will include YOUR interaction as an example. Even if you manage to do the liberal trick of ‘nuancing’ your position, you will not be able to hide how much of an asshole you simply have been. Perhaps your efforts would be well spent in getting the mods to remove posts or even this whole article from FR? Best of luck.
Where did I mention CHF? Even once? LOL!
Kevmoron indeed.
***Name calling. Maybe you could get the mods to delete this entire thread just as other skeptopaths in the past have done so. Maybe it would make you look better to posterity.... hah hah hah ah ahahhhahhh yup. maybe. hah hah... hah. yah, that’s funny... yup, hah hah....
LOL indeed, for posterity!!!! Hah hah. Thanks for displaying your ignorance like a peacock.
You're not that important.
And yet, they have in the past. You seem to be half a step behind everything. And thank you SO MUCH for being that way.
I enjoy your idiocy. Always good for a laugh.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.