Posted on 01/24/2014 12:52:47 PM PST by Morgana
Silly question...does the baby have a say?
You gotta be a cold hearted sumbitch to go to court to murder your baby.
Let’s wait until he can talk and ask him.
Prayers up for Marlise and her unborn child.
I do not believe reports that the baby is damaged in any way. This is just an excuse for cold-blooded murder!
I don’t get it. I was just reading in People how much she wanted to be a mother and how much they were looking forward to this baby UNTIL she collapsed. Now they’re saying it’s inhumane to keep her alive as an “incubator”. There is something good that can come out of this and they’re just willing to kill it. It’s disgusting.
I think the Duggar’s family had a premature baby at 22 weeks. Josie I think. She is doing fine from the last TLC show we saw.
Can’t the baby be delivered by C-section? Babies a lot younger than 22 weeks have survived. So what’s the problem?
That alive, growing child is not an it. Don’t help the bastards steal the terminology and dehumanize that alive unborn child.
how is it that when a perpetrator kills a woman and her unbornd child hes is charged with Murdering...them both but when a mother “chooses” and abortion...or a father chooses to take his pregnant wife off life support thereby terminating the LIFE of the unborn child its not RECOGNIZED as Murder??
this seems so seldom discussed..and is never addressed by the choice bozoe
Insanity. . .if she was murdered the murderer would be charged with TWO murders. . .even if she was on the way to an abortion clinic.
Liberals and logic, can’t occupy the same universe.
Sigh.
Wow... the pro-death lobby gets a “twofer” on this one...
Thought it was supposed to be the woman’s “choice”. I thought men weren’t supposed to have a say in abortion...must only be when they oppose it.
No baby has ever survived “a lot younger” than 22 weeks. Earliest survival is 23 weeks and change
You are incorrect, there is no pro death agenda on mom — she is dead. I agree with the keeping her ventilated and circulating for baby to go to viability, but mom is dead by the law and the clinical findings.
I thought her husband just claimed that. I’m still rather suspicious in the husband’s role in this...
Of course, these were lawyer making these medical statements - lawyers who are hired by the kille.... uh, husband, who wants her to die. Really unbiased "experts" there.
I do not believe she left behind a directive. I belive it is her husband who is claiming that she didn’t want to be kept alive on life support.
Never trust your family.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.