Posted on 02/01/2014 10:34:31 AM PST by lasereye
“Must have been really big tanks to put in all the sharks and whales and such. Plus having to go catch all of them and bring them back to the ark.”
Without a doubt a complicated process, but perhaps not as difficult as you infer as the salt water aquatic life that could maintain swimming strength throughout the deluge and not be entombed in sediment would not have to be on the Ark’s manifest.
However, those species that could be entombed by sediment and all those in fresh water would have to be placed in such tanks.
So we can identify the trilobites on the Ark because they're not rolled up? Can you tell me which two on this page are the ones?
And then can you explain why the others aren't rolled up, if that was the characteristic trilobite response to being rapidly inundated?
I did not write the article as it was penned by Dr. Timothy Clarey who is a genuine scientist with a PhD.
It is Dr. Clarey who has done genuine scientific research on trilobites, the Ark and the Great Flood and I bet he knows his business and knows a whole bunch more about the entire 6000 year history of the earth than your ordinary American.
I know you didn’t write the article, but you wrote the assertion I quoted. I was just asking you to think for yourself about its implications.
As for Dr. Clary’s degree: I’m sure you realize that there are more than a few PhDs out there who think the Earth is older than 6000 years. Or do they not count because they disagree with you?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.