Make the cops use them first.
To: Second Amendment First
This crap has been around for years
2 posted on
02/04/2014 7:45:11 AM PST by
headstamp 2
(What would Scooby do?)
To: Second Amendment First
And this would stop gang-bangers from killing each other how, exactly?
4 posted on
02/04/2014 7:47:24 AM PST by
E. Pluribus Unum
(The only way women can "have it all" is if men aren't allowed to have anything.)
To: Second Amendment First
“watch that transmits an identifying radio frequency that prevents everyone but its wearer from firing.”
So it’s not specific to the owner, just whoever clubs the owner and has the watch.
I bet transmitting a strong CW carrier would prevent the receiver from getting its signal from the watch.
6 posted on
02/04/2014 7:48:14 AM PST by
DBrow
To: Second Amendment First
8 posted on
02/04/2014 7:49:32 AM PST by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: Second Amendment First
Ya know, we oughta start calling these people who want to restrict the 2nd out for what they are:
RACISTS.
The very first gun control laws in America were done to keep certain races from doing things that those who enacted the laws didn’t want them to be doing.
Just start calling out to them, “Gun control is RAAAACIST!”
9 posted on
02/04/2014 7:51:01 AM PST by
RandallFlagg
("I said I never had much use for one. Never said I didn't know how to use it." --Quigley)
To: Second Amendment First
Uh, speaking of Sandy Hook...
If the kid's mom had owned one of these guns, wouldn't he have taken the wristwatch thingie when he took the guns to go kill people with, after he killed his mom?
Huh?
F'n stupid.
10 posted on
02/04/2014 7:51:13 AM PST by
OKSooner
("As the riders went on by him, he heard one call his name...")
To: Second Amendment First
Exactly.
When the cops trust THEIR lives to them, then I will.
And suppose I’m not home, and my wife or kids need to use it quickly for a kick-in style home invasion?
Nah.
I’ll keep what I got - regardless.
After all... THIS IS MY MOST BASIC RIGHT - Constitutional, Civil, and Human Right.
12 posted on
02/04/2014 7:53:53 AM PST by
NFHale
(The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
To: Second Amendment First
Police first for a ten-year test.
14 posted on
02/04/2014 7:57:18 AM PST by
Travis McGee
(www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
To: Second Amendment First
Just what i have searching for: a gun which lights up in the dark.
I hope they have liability insurance to cover the first failure.
To: Second Amendment First
do you really want to rely on this thing....or it’s batteries!!!
16 posted on
02/04/2014 8:03:26 AM PST by
ontap
To: Second Amendment First
Earth calling to Smart Tech Challenges Foundation:
Semiautomatic firearms are 100 year old technology that can probably be practiced in your basement with a modest investment in fabrication gear (including 3D printers).
Maybe for their next trick, Smart Tech Challenges will come up with biometric lock-out solutions for baseball bats and pointy dinnerware.
19 posted on
02/04/2014 8:04:55 AM PST by
indthkr
To: Second Amendment First
Until the government floods the airways with a signal to disable the guns.
20 posted on
02/04/2014 8:07:47 AM PST by
muir_redwoods
(When I first read it, " Atlas Shrugged" was fiction)
To: Second Amendment First
I wear my Watch on my Left Wrist. I shoot a Gun with my Right Hand.
What’s the “range” of the Signal?
21 posted on
02/04/2014 8:08:00 AM PST by
Kickass Conservative
(Nobody owes you a living, so shut up and get back to work...)
To: Second Amendment First
In anticipation, the cops have probably already developed a radio jammer that prevents anyone from using the gun at all.
22 posted on
02/04/2014 8:09:07 AM PST by
Telepathic Intruder
(The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
To: Second Amendment First
Great. Electronic devices to jam your ability to fire your weapon will become hot commodities on the street (and elsewhere).
24 posted on
02/04/2014 8:13:53 AM PST by
kidd
To: Second Amendment First
This would make a great scene in a thriller or horror movie. Serial murderer is coming up the stairs, victim pulls out safety gun, but it doesn’t work because she has really dirty hands. Will she be able to clean her hands sufficiently in time for the gun to work or will she become the killer’s next victim?
25 posted on
02/04/2014 8:14:50 AM PST by
MNDude
To: Second Amendment First
29 posted on
02/04/2014 8:31:14 AM PST by
JoeProBono
(SOME IMAGES MAY BE DISTURBING VIEWER DISCRETION IS ADVISED;-{)
To: Second Amendment First
Riddle me this: If and when your batteries go dead (and usually when it will be needed in the gravest extreme), then this pistol becomes as useful as a rock. This pistol needs to be tested by law enforcement agencies. I recommend the FBI and BATFE. If they can't or won't use the technology, then that says something about the usefulness of the idea, doesn't it?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson