Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Panty Protest: Kazakhstan Women Outraged by Lace Underwear Ban
NBC ^ | 2/17/14 | Alexander Smith

Posted on 02/17/2014 7:02:42 AM PST by workerbee

Women took to the streets wearing panties on their heads Sunday as they protested new laws banning lace underwear in Kazakhstan.

The legislation - which includes provisions covering the required level of moisture absorbtion in the garments - will come into force this summer in Kazakhstan as well as Russia and Belarus, according to the Moscow Times.

This sparked the so-called "Panties for the President" demonstrations in the Kazakh capital, Almaty, on Sunday.

"It irritates me the most that the authorities want to decide what I should wear," Iryna Davydenko, a bank manager who travels regularly between Kazakhstan, Russia and Ukraine, told Al Arabiya English. "As if all other issues in the country are solved and the only outstanding issue is ladies' panties."

(Excerpt) Read more at nbcnews.com ...


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: irynadavydenko; islamiclaw; kazakhstan; micromanagement; panties; pantiesinawad; russia; sharialaw; ukraine; waronwomen
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: workerbee

In Soviet Kazakhstan, panties line you.


21 posted on 02/17/2014 7:39:27 AM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grobdriver

I would also guess there are no Victoria’s Secret stores in Kazakhstan.


22 posted on 02/17/2014 7:40:26 AM PST by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tenacious 1

Of course, it’s a silly law that takes away individual choice. I’m sure glad the US doesn’t have any of those.


23 posted on 02/17/2014 7:43:08 AM PST by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: workerbee

I'm outraged for them.

24 posted on 02/17/2014 8:03:04 AM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tenacious 1
Cotton vs. polyester? Silk Vs. Lycra? Paper Vs. Plastic? Is it legal for their woman to "not where panties at all"? How do they calculate the resulting "absorption rate" of that?

The proposed regulation doesn't ban wearing, it bans selling. No new hygienic certificate for such pants anymore, and selling ungergarments without one is a misdemeanour punished with a fine.

The absorbtion is measured in a lab when a producer/importer provides a sample. The method, I guess, is weighting the sample before and after moisturizing it.

25 posted on 02/17/2014 8:21:48 AM PST by Freelance Warrior (A Russian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: workerbee
"...legislation - which includes provisions covering the required level of moisture absorption in the garments...."

If Congress can dictate what toilets and light bulbs we can use why not regulate panties as well.

26 posted on 02/17/2014 8:29:28 AM PST by The Great RJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: workerbee

next thing you know, they will be compothing a patriotic thong about this ithue.


27 posted on 02/17/2014 8:38:32 AM PST by left that other site
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave

The scary thing is that if they’re throwing those numbers around, they clearly already have a bureaucracy that is dedicated to running around and measuring moisture inside womens’ panties.


28 posted on 02/17/2014 8:45:48 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

I served in that bureaucracy — or at least a spontaneous college chapter — but that was before I met my wife ...


29 posted on 02/17/2014 9:13:56 AM PST by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar

Another example of totalitarianism.


30 posted on 02/17/2014 9:16:03 AM PST by zot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: left that other site

Ladies and gentlemen, we have a winner! Please exit the thread in a orderly fashion ...


31 posted on 02/17/2014 9:46:54 AM PST by Tax-chick (The future is not going to take us seriously.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

hee hee Hee.

Thanks! ;-)


32 posted on 02/17/2014 9:59:16 AM PST by left that other site
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Ping.


33 posted on 02/17/2014 10:29:53 AM PST by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave

ROFL!


34 posted on 02/17/2014 11:33:35 AM PST by workerbee (The President of the United States is DOMESTIC ENEMY #1!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

35 posted on 02/17/2014 11:37:00 AM PST by workerbee (The President of the United States is DOMESTIC ENEMY #1!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

I have noticed a lack of attention to men’s undies...boxers or briefs....question.


36 posted on 02/17/2014 11:49:35 AM PST by Conservative4Ever (waiting for my Magic 8 ball to give me an answer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Conservative4Ever; Revolting cat!
I have noticed a lack of attention to men’s undies...boxers or briefs....question.

Don't ask, don't tell!


37 posted on 02/17/2014 3:20:44 PM PST by a fool in paradise ("Health care is too important to be left to the government.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ
If Congress can dictate what toilets and light bulbs we can use why not regulate panties as well.

"You made a BINGO!"


38 posted on 02/17/2014 3:23:10 PM PST by a fool in paradise ("Health care is too important to be left to the government.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson