Posted on 02/21/2014 2:39:18 PM PST by butterdezillion
Remember that video of the plane crash in Hawaii after which Hawaii Health Director Loretta Fuddy "died"?
You need to take a closer look.
I suppose he could have been riding in the cargo hold of the plane
One of the 9 people on board? Any opinion as to which one? All constructive input is good.
Are we sure that a diver would be an assassin, if it was a diver?
Hang In There!
My mind saw something looking like it might be a diver...perhaps triggered by the upright inflation-pipe fro the float-collar which looks like a snorkel tube.
But on a subsequent look, the yellow object appears to be the right-side sole of a pair of yellow-soled footware, possibly near the cocked right knee of Fuddy.
Lying back in the water with her feet toward the camera but angled to the viewer’s left, Fuddy may have cocked her (quite obese) right knee creating the impression of the back of a divers head thus lifting the toe of her right yellow shoe briefly out of the water.
Then she extends the leg straightening it out to her right causing the knee to descend into the water and the toe of the yellow shoe to move towards the viewer’s left.
No. Not just why, how is the more important question.
Yes. She’s probably kicking her legs to move about.
Ok! I did it! But it’s not a diver, it’s herself!!! I got it from that link to the blog. I watched the photos backward.
Image 19 shows this main person, is it supposed to be Fuddy?, from below her two feet, which are bobbing near the camera, the foot on the left, this person we are calling Fuddy’s right foot, is in a sock. It appears to be a white sock with black patterning on both the sole and the top of the sock.
Image 18 and 17 show that socked foot. The image makes it appear as though the dark part of the bottom of the sock comes up in a kewpie doll hair point, but that is just the turn of the foot and lighting freak. The outline of the foot is clearly foot shaped and larger than the black patternng.
16 is not close up, you still see the foot, which is starting to go under water or a wave in 15, as the forehead of the other person looms into the bottom right of pic.
14, you see the wave over the foot (which almost gone under water) and bigger dunk of the other guy’s forehead.
13 you can’t see that socked foot - it’s not above the water - but starting to see Fuddy’s body, wearing black or dark clothing - the shiny black that we thought might be a wetsuit. Could be a clinging dress but most likely jeans or something. What was Fuddy wearing that day?
From 12 to 10, you can see more of the leg or torso of Fuddy coming above water. Maybe knee. By 10 you can see that socked foot again. Clearly if this were a frogman he is between her legs so it maybe was a rape attack and not a murder, lol. Sorry, i know this isn’t funny. But no frog man would get THAT CLOSE.
By pics 4 and 5 the black part of Fuddy looks like her knee.
But on pic 7 and 8 there is something weird: the part of the black near that foot seems to have wrinkles around the ankle area like wrinkles around a tied balloon opening or -— sorry for the reference -— a rear end - or a pursed pair of lips. Can’t figure that out.
But it does look like the “frogman” is part of Fuddy. Especially if she had been wearing a smooth like jeans dark fabric that day.
Wondering What Tomorrow Will Bring?
Puentes had one point where the image was totally dark in the cabin, which would have given time for extra people in the plane to exit and then that time period could be edited out in that month between the crash and when this video came out.
The GMA announcer (or was it Nightline?) at one point used the time clock on the video to say that everybody was out of the plane in less than 2 minutes into the video. Yet the slowest part of the plane sinking - the part where the mostly-empty fuel tanks kept the plane afloat, before the air inside was displaced by water - was over by the time the video has the last people exiting. The plane is front-heavy - being brought down by the water in the fuel tanks - by the time the last ones got out.
My thougts too. Donald young et al
CN you hook your computer up to a projector or large screen TV. You might be able to decipher what you are seeing
In that scenario where is Fuddy’s head? Which way is she facing?
Just adding in case it’s not clear what I saw: you have to start with pic 19 and work backward. Because pic 19 is clearly the main person (I can’t tell who but supposedly Fuddy right?) lying down sort of, in the water, and the photo is toward her, from between her two feet, both feet clearly visit le with toes pointing up out of the water. The foot on the right, Fuddy’s left foot, is black, possibly still,shod. The foot on the,left appears to be Ina patterned sock, light colored with black on it too.
Once you see, clearly, this is how her body is positioned, the other photos make more sense, image by image, going back by number from 19, the 18, etc.
I think I can seea bit of her forehead behind the orange float. I think I can see her right hand clasping the hand of the guy floating to her right in correct relation to where I am thinking I see her right knee...
IIRC, obese people can be somewhat buoyant, but I am not sure (not being one or having gone swimming with one that I can remember).
The might have made a kick in response to the cardiac event claimed as likely by the coroner, but I have no medical knowledge of how the body responds.
What I remember the guy that was holding her hand say was that he only let go AFTER she appeared to be dead, not before. If true, then this picture was before or perhaps DURING the cardiac event and her going lifeless.
I’m pretty sure that what you are seeing is the shoes and legs of the person laying on their back to the right of the person whose head is visible. Especially img# 6, 7, and 8.
Yamamoto, Jacob and Rosa Key are now aso in extreme danger of their lives. However much theyhave been paid to stay silent, or however loyal to the Left they are, they are not major players in the cabal and cannot be trusted to forever hold their peace unless holding their peace is physically assured.
You don't kill someone with a secret who has disclosed that secret. That just compounds your problem. You kill someone who possesses that secret undisclosed so that it surely will not be disclosed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.