Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Secret Negotiation with Hijackers Theory Bolsters: Missing Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 Revealed
International Business Times ^ | March 12, 2014 | Gopi Chandra Kharel

Posted on 03/13/2014 12:40:02 AM PDT by hamboy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last
I hope this is not hoax!
1 posted on 03/13/2014 12:40:03 AM PDT by hamboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: hamboy

At this point either the government is with holding information that would not look make them look good, or aliens took the damned thing.


2 posted on 03/13/2014 12:51:47 AM PDT by VerySadAmerican (".....Barrack, and the horse Mohammed rode in on.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VerySadAmerican

Odyssey of Flight 33


3 posted on 03/13/2014 1:00:12 AM PDT by LukeL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: VerySadAmerican

I agree. 777s just don’t disappear. There had to be some indication of what was happening. If they lost all power the plane would have gone down on its route. The fact that it was diverted means something was happening and the pilots would have reported it...unless someone was holding a gun to their head!


4 posted on 03/13/2014 1:04:45 AM PDT by gr8eman (But thermodynamics is just a social construct, created by the ruling white power structure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gr8eman

Ate they were involved in it


5 posted on 03/13/2014 1:11:50 AM PDT by easternsky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gr8eman; VerySadAmerican

WSJ, UK Daily Mail, etc. now saying the plane sent engine data to Boeing and Rolls Royce which indicate they may have operated a further four hours after it vanished from radar. So even if the plane’s transponders were turned off still the plane called home?


6 posted on 03/13/2014 1:15:34 AM PDT by hamboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: easternsky

Correction Are they were involved in it


7 posted on 03/13/2014 1:20:43 AM PDT by easternsky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: easternsky
Malaysia has F/A-18's.. Eight of them. This aircraft was probably shot down after it changed course. After 9/11, isn't that the logical thing to do? Horrible but what other alternative was their for Malaysia, India, China???

This is why there's been so much diversion of search teams, stalling, etc... The hard part is admitting to the families that you HAD to shoot down their aircraft and they'd NEVER ACCEPT THAT even though it was the right thing to do. Taking it down before it reaches land is a must, and if there's any wreckage its way off course.

8 posted on 03/13/2014 1:20:44 AM PDT by CivilWarBrewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarBrewing

Sometime around that time we had a bunch fly out, supposedly to the Ukraine. Who knows.... those in charge do but not telling, how long can they keep it from coming out?


9 posted on 03/13/2014 1:24:35 AM PDT by easternsky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarBrewing

how could it been shot down if WSJ and UK Daily Mail reporting that the plane sent engine data to Boeing and Rolls Royce it was airborned for four more hours after it vanished from radar?


10 posted on 03/13/2014 1:30:16 AM PDT by hamboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: hamboy

It still seems possible that the hijacked Malaysian Flight MH370 actually made it to some unknown destination.


11 posted on 03/13/2014 1:38:35 AM PDT by equaviator (There's nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hamboy

Yeah, I read that. They are saying that the engines indicate an estimated 2,200 additional miles flight. The particulars as to just how the info was gotten is vague to me and there was no indication of direction. That’s an awful long ways to go evading radar. Hard to buy. Of course I’m just going off “Breaking News”.


12 posted on 03/13/2014 2:02:43 AM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: hamboy

I’m not one for conspiracy theories. Most of them are BS, IMO.

But this story stinks. Other than a sudden catastrophic explosion, which would be hard enough to explain let alone NOT detect, too much else would have to happen coincidentally to make a plane disappear like this without a warning, trace, mayday, etc..

The fish stinks from the head down.


13 posted on 03/13/2014 10:30:20 AM PDT by TangledUpInBlue (I have no home. I'm the wind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hamboy; All

At this point we know NOTHING. Even the so called data from ACARS has not been verified. Those are short bursts not all the time real time (too much bandwidth needed for that so it was not ever done). This ACARS pings come ONLY if there is something mechanically wrong to notify ground crews of what needs repair (gives them a heads up and some time to get parts together). After a;; the unnamed sources from WSJ article the so called news out was that the last ACARS ping was around 1:10am local time which was just after the last flight deck contact.

At this point no one knows anything. All the speculation does not create facts


14 posted on 03/13/2014 10:32:07 AM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hamboy

Those so called stories cite unnamed sources....hard to believe when no names or sources attached.

From the local news sources try this

“”The Wall Street Journal newspaper quoted U.S. investigators on Thursday as saying they suspected the plane remained in the air for about four hours after its last confirmed contact, citing data from the plane’s engines that are automatically transmitted to the ground as part of a routine maintenance program.
Hishammuddin said the government had contacted Boeing and Rolls Royce, the engine manufacturer, and both said the last engine data was received at 1:07 a.m., around 23 minutes before the plane lost contact.”

You can dispute this if you want but neither Boeing nor Rolls Royce is saying anything different. ACARS is NOT a continuous feed. It tracks and sends during important times and gives data in bursts. The only time that alters is if there is mechanically malfunction that needs repair at landing.


15 posted on 03/13/2014 10:35:08 AM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hamboy

and they are not telling the truth. They are engaged in no sense and speculation. When you won’t name your sources or their affiliation I tend not to believe you.

We have NOTHING at this point except an airliner is missing


16 posted on 03/13/2014 10:36:32 AM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarBrewing

So, the conspiracy extend to BHO? Wouldn’t the NSA be eavesdropping on comms, a la the USSR taking down KAL 007?


17 posted on 03/13/2014 10:38:41 AM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: VerySadAmerican

I read a book many years ago titled, “Xeno”. Planes that disappeared started turning back up. They carried a nasty little bug that caused all kinds of trouble.


18 posted on 03/13/2014 10:49:39 AM PDT by W.Lee (After the first one, the rest are free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

“This ACARS pings come ONLY if there is something mechanically wrong to notify ground crews of what needs repair”

I think that depends if they are also using it for trend monitoring. In that case there are many exceedences that will also cause it to ping. If for example the aircraft were hijacked and put into a steep dive, several allowed engine parameters could have been exceeded. Likewise flying too fast too low to the ground would as well.

Don’t play by the rules and them engine manufacturers are going to make sure your power by the hour cost increases!


19 posted on 03/13/2014 10:50:41 AM PDT by I cannot think of a name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

Agreed...speculation is not news...unless you run a news network that pretends speculation is news


20 posted on 03/13/2014 10:53:47 AM PDT by rights with responsibilities
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson