Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Olog-hai
So you agree with Reid, then. You want government-provided daycare to substitute for what a mother is supposed to give to her child? and a missing father figure?

What is your alternative? Put the mother on welfare so she can stay home with her child? You don't think that assisting with day care costs might not be cheaper than welfare?

If you don’t understand and/or reject the traditional family, you are not a conservative.

And please, please, please tell me what is conservative about sticking your head in the sand and pretending that every child in the country would be living in a traditional family if only they did away with day care subsidies. What world do you live in?

44 posted on 03/13/2014 2:11:43 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: DoodleDawg

More children would be living in traditional families if our governmental policy didn’t subsidize bastardity.


47 posted on 03/13/2014 2:14:19 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: DoodleDawg

You are trying to direct the argument away from the traditional family, I see. Welfare is one liberal anti-family alternative, just as daycare is the other.

You are further arguing that leftism is an inevitability. I think, with all due respect, it is you with your head in the sand. Are you insisting on perpetuating liberalism by continuing to reward it?


50 posted on 03/13/2014 2:33:18 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson