To: GrandJediMasterYoda
A ridiculous idea...prolong the life of a criminal to let them experience some kind of living hell. Isn’t that cruel & unusual?
Personally, I’ve never understood why we give any medical care (other than comfort care) to lifers. Shouldn’t we be letting nature hurry them on their way?
3 posted on
03/15/2014 2:11:06 PM PDT by
Twotone
(Marte Et Clypeo)
To: Twotone
A ridiculous idea...prolong the life of a criminal to let them experience some kind of living hell. Isnt that cruel & unusual? Yes; the founders would be horrified at that prospect.
9 posted on
03/15/2014 2:53:29 PM PDT by
OneWingedShark
(Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
To: Twotone
In a world with life extension technology, prisoners are most likely to be condemned to short lives as punishment.
In the book “The Declaration”, the punishment for almost everything severe is death because life extension means less death and more resource strain. Keeping criminals alive then becomes immoral in the face of the needs of law abiding citizens.
13 posted on
03/15/2014 4:07:42 PM PDT by
tbw2
To: Twotone
Yes and France had the right idea with Ghana.
A prison system so bad the sentence was near certain death to all who got it. Gitmo IS a club med and refitting center for all terrorist sent there. Gitmo is a reward trip not nearly a sentence of any kind.
14 posted on
03/15/2014 4:12:08 PM PDT by
JSteff
(It was ALL about SCOTUS.. We are DOOMED for several generations. . Who cares? Dem's did and voted!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson