Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IRS Rules Bitcoin Is Property (Not Currency)
Zero Hedge ^ | 25 March 2014 | Tyler Durden

Posted on 03/25/2014 11:49:35 AM PDT by Errant

After less than three months consideration, the IRS has issued its statement clarifying th etax treatment of Bitcoins (and other virtual currencies) before the April 15th Deadline. The finding, summarized, is that Vitual currencies will be treated as property (not as a currency) which, as WSJ notes, means an investor who buys bitcoin would typically have a capital gain or loss when it’s sold. The price of Bitcoin is rising modestly on this news...

(Excerpt) Read more at zerohedge.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Religion
KEYWORDS: bitcoin; crypto; currency; goldbugs; irs; tylerdurden; tylerdurdenmyass; zerohedge
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
Pretty much how I had it figured as well, at least for now.
1 posted on 03/25/2014 11:49:35 AM PDT by Errant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin; nascarnation; TsonicTsunami08; SgtHooper; Ghost of SVR4; Lee N. Field; DTA; ...

Click to be Added / Removed.
2 posted on 03/25/2014 11:49:54 AM PDT by Errant (Surround yourself with intelligent and industrious people who help and support each other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Errant

Because unlike Federal reserve notes, virtual currency is worth something!


3 posted on 03/25/2014 11:51:46 AM PDT by DaveyB ("When injustice becomes the law; rebellion becomes duty." - Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Text of IRS Guidance on Bitcoin: Property, not Currency [WSJ]
4 posted on 03/25/2014 11:52:23 AM PDT by Errant (Surround yourself with intelligent and industrious people who help and support each other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Errant

Trying to attach a cost to BC use both to dissuade and because it’s the future.


5 posted on 03/25/2014 11:52:55 AM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaveyB

Lol, well probably because FRNs are the only “legal” currency of the land. And now that they’ve allowed the (BTC) horse to escape the barn, they have no other choice. ;)


6 posted on 03/25/2014 11:55:51 AM PDT by Errant (Surround yourself with intelligent and industrious people who help and support each other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Errant

This is not good news for Bitcoin.

If it were a “Currency” than its increased Buying power would NOT be taxable.

It may now be that Bitcoins that appreciate and a traded for Goods become a “Taxable” event.

Compared to our Dollar for example. An increase in its buying power is not a taxable event.


7 posted on 03/25/2014 11:55:54 AM PDT by Zeneta (Thoughts in time and out of season.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Errant

This is a record keeping killer. Every transaction would require a paper trail and a determination of capital gain or loss. If sustained, this ruling would kill bitcoins for everyday use in the US.


8 posted on 03/25/2014 11:58:43 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Errant

They don’t dare call it currency - yet.

Gives it credibility.


9 posted on 03/25/2014 12:00:09 PM PDT by cuban leaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

It does complicate things. Seems to me you’re going to have to determine a basis for any that are sold/traded for FRNs. Not sure how it will work if you simply trade them for some other good or service. I guess I should actually read the guidance I myself linked to before speculating. ;)


10 posted on 03/25/2014 12:00:40 PM PDT by Errant (Surround yourself with intelligent and industrious people who help and support each other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Errant

Like it or not, what the IRS rules is the way it’s gonna be. Now people can begin to accumulate some, and make plans for it.


11 posted on 03/25/2014 12:01:37 PM PDT by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible traitors. Complicit in the destruction of our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Truth29
Every transaction would require a paper trail and a determination of capital gain or loss.

It may not apply in a trade, where you exchange Btc for a good or service of equal value. You will have to keep up with your basis and/or expenses if you sell/cash out for FRNs, as with any asset such as equities and etc. I'm no tax expert by any means however.

12 posted on 03/25/2014 12:05:44 PM PDT by Errant (Surround yourself with intelligent and industrious people who help and support each other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Errant

Are Bitcoins are Deemed “Property”, like an equity/Stock or “Real Property” like a home/car/pair of underwear?

There’s a huge difference.


13 posted on 03/25/2014 12:06:55 PM PDT by Zeneta (Thoughts in time and out of season.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Errant

Does this make it subject to sales tax? The whores in Sacramento need money.


14 posted on 03/25/2014 12:06:58 PM PDT by Lurkina.n.Learnin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Errant

The determination of cost basis would be for every transaction, no matter how minor. From the linked article:
“Today’s IRS guidance will provide certainty for investors, along with potential income-tax liability. Under the ruling, purchasing a $2 cup of coffee with Bitcoins bought for $1 would trigger $1 in capital gains for the coffee drinker and $2 of income for the coffee shop.”


15 posted on 03/25/2014 12:11:45 PM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin
That would come under state taxing authorities. For instance, private sales in our state aren't taxed. However if you were to buy Btc from a local dealer, that might mean your have to pay sales tax in my state.

It's complicated, as there are exceptions in our state law for things that qualify for "investment purposes" like gold, silver, coins, and etc.

At least we and the states have some guidance to work from now, and we no longer have to fear a raid by treasury agents for having illegal currency, since they've ruled that it isn't (currency). :-)

16 posted on 03/25/2014 12:13:46 PM PDT by Errant (Surround yourself with intelligent and industrious people who help and support each other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: gaijin
Trying to attach a cost to BC use both to dissuade and because it’s the future.

They don't care if people use it, they just want their "fair share"... same as if you trade art, real estate or any other things of value.

17 posted on 03/25/2014 12:14:07 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Errant

From zerohedge:


Is a person who “mines” a virtual currency considered to have received income?

Yes, and if the taxpayer engages in mining as a trade or business, self-employment tax is often due.


This is going to be a problem.

Bitcoins are fungible and globally mined. If a US company issues “Equity/Stocks” is that a taxable event? I don’t think it is.


18 posted on 03/25/2014 12:14:17 PM PDT by Zeneta (Thoughts in time and out of season.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Errant

Well... Sure. Currencies are property, too. Currency just means it’s a form of property that everybody has, so it is useful as a medium of exchange. Bowling balls could be currency too except we’d all need really big pockets.


19 posted on 03/25/2014 12:15:28 PM PDT by Ramius (Personally, I give us one chance in three. More tea anyone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Errant

Oh sure... But NorFed warehouse receipts and physical gold coins were “counterfeit currency” subject to seizure...


20 posted on 03/25/2014 12:15:48 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (Tre Norner eg ber, binde til rota...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson