Skip to comments.A History of the Disastrous Global Warming Hoax
Posted on 03/31/2014 7:31:50 AM PDT by Excellence
It is the greatest deception in history and the extent of the damage has yet to be exposed and measured, says Dr. Tim Ball in his new book, The Deliberate Corruption of Climate Science.
Several UN conferences set in motion the hoax that is based on the assertion that carbon dioxide (CO2) was causing a dramatic surge in heating the Earth. IPCC reports have continued to spread this lie through their summaries for policy makers that influenced policies that have caused nations worldwide to spend billions to reduce and restrict CO2 emissions. Manmade climate changecalled anthropogenic global warmingcontinues to be the message though mankind plays no role whatever.
(Excerpt) Read more at blog.heartland.org ...
Thar’s gold in them thar hockey sticks! (And power, too)
If climate change were real, we would be working crash programs to build next generation nuclear reactors and thorium reactors.
I love to post on lib websites like Huffington or Buzzfeed calling the Global warming scam a hoax and it’s amazing how incredibly vicious the libs get when you call it that, even when you mention facts like Al Gore making half a billion from the hoax because they hate capitalists so much, they don’t care they still flip out, they are complete lemmings. It’s like a freakin’ cult.
Does Rush still have his Al Gore countdown to Armageddon on his website? That was great, Al Gore said something to the effect of “In 10 years the earth will be too hot to support life” so Rush started a “Countdown to Armageddon” clock and I think it’s getting pretty close to 10 years now! LOL!
This movie out this last weekend is trying to PROMOTE the Global Warming agenda by sneaking it into a supposed Bible story. As it turns out, it bears no resemblance to the Bible - but - reflects the agenda of the liberal, leftist, atheist, ‘green’, global warming and enviro-whacko director of the movie!
The Noah film is afloat with extremism
They just came out with another report: http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3139021/posts
If global warming is real and the science is indeed “settled”, why then do we need to continue spending hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars o research grants and promoting it? As with all things political, when the facts don’t add up follow the money.....
They will never give up, even in the face of facts.
Even the Cosmos Redux can’t help themselves, they mention it at least once per episode. Funny, I had some hopes when they started the show by explaining the Scientific Method. Then they proceed to completely ignore it when it comes to AGW, where correlation, computer models and conjecture are passed off as “science.” Neil DeGrasse Tyson should really have stepped away from delivering those lines, if he was a true scientist, but far too many of them have lost their way in order to join the “consensus” (Sagan, Kaku, etc).
P.S. Anyone who ever says “the science is settled” automatically loses. Science is never settled, by definition.
P.P.S. Anyone who says “consensus” automatically loses, there is no consensus in science, only repeatable experimentation. There was a consensus of scientists once who believed leeches could remove bad humours.
But then again if you base the "Greatest" title on the amount of money transferred and wasted then it is indeed the winner.
What truly makes me sad is that many scientific papers are now required to include an “obligatory global warming paragraph”, no matter how unrelated they are to the hysteria.
The forced insertion of dialectic into science reached its apex in the Soviet Union, where you could not publish a paper about how to raise chickens unless less it was structured in communist speak. “The people’s chickens, who struggle to support the proletariat by producing maximum eggs and their meat when they can no longer make eggs.”
Ironically, such forced insertions have little to do with persuasion, and everything to do with forcing the writers to bow their heads and submit to the will of their masters.
“Anyone who ever says the science is settled automatically loses.”
Absolutely! It’s not like geometry where it “is what it is”.
There was another scare article on Yahoo yesterday. The comments were interesting; 80-90% of them are the sort you would see here.
It took a while but Joe Schmoe has figured out it’s a scam. They hyped it too much.
Global warming is their religion. Publically calling their religion a hoax is the same as dissing Mohammed in an Islamic country. I like to point this out to them. Then I insist on separation of church and state.
“When the global warming advocates began to tell people that cooling is caused by warming, the public has realized how absurd the entire UN climate change argument has been.”
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH
THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT ISN’T
GLOBAL WARMING CAUSES GLOBAL COOLING
DEMOCRATS CARE ABOUT YOU
LOL! It’s true, you get the same kind of hate from them that you get from Islamos when you diss Mohammed. One guy did a search of me he was so infuriated and sent messages to my friends on Facebook saying I was an idiot. I told him if he was stressed out with money problems he should ask his Messiah Al Gore to lend him part of his $500 million dollar fortune. He still posts crap on me to this day every now and then, and this is from last year when I called it a hoax. Democrats love idiots like that, they know they can control them, get them to do anything.
The forced insertion of dialectic into science reached its apex in the Soviet Union, where you could not publish a paper about how to raise chickens unless less it was structured in communist speak.
80 pages in an engineering treatise. That told me everything I needed to know about the horrors of living under Communism.