The article opens with the fact that she was openly “gay.” I’m sure she has a partner and is pushing for the overturn of the state’s marriage amendment - that’s what openly “gay” means to these people.
There were verifiable instances of dereliction on duty, probably the tip of the iceberg. The fact that there had been no reprimands is easily explained by suffocating political correctness which looks away from self-proclaimed grievance groups, lawsuit-prone territory.
Kudos to the new mayor, who apparently recognizes and proclaims the nakedness of the emperor.
If that were true then not only would I expect the Daily Mail, hardly a conservative paper by U.S. standards, to mention it. And this being small town South Carolina I would expect it would have alienated much of the population. Neither seems to be the case.
There were verifiable instances of dereliction on duty, probably the tip of the iceberg. The fact that there had been no reprimands is easily explained by suffocating political correctness which looks away from self-proclaimed grievance groups, lawsuit-prone territory.
Were there? Then why were none of them reported and why did the city council support a derelict police chief?
Kudos to the new mayor, who apparently recognizes and proclaims the nakedness of the emperor
It's a matter of opinion which side has no clothes - the police chief and officer of 20 year standing with an unblemished record or the new mayor who hires cronies who violate the law?