Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EPA scales back biofuel mandate to reflect reality
Associated Press ^ | Apr 22, 2014 5:48 PM EDT | Dina Cappiello

Posted on 04/23/2014 3:45:26 AM PDT by Olog-hai

The Obama administration is significantly reducing the amount of cellulosic biofuels refiners will have to prove they blended into gasoline last year, acknowledging that the market lagged far behind government projections.

The EPA on Tuesday said it was basing its 2013 standard on the 810,185 ethanol-equivalent gallons produced with nonfood plants last year. …

(Excerpt) Read more at hosted.ap.org ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Chit/Chat; Miscellaneous; Travel
KEYWORDS: biofuels; energy; epa; ethanol; globalwarminghoax; ipcc; mandate; opec

1 posted on 04/23/2014 3:45:26 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Scaling back is not the same as eliminating and like many other government programs, nothing is quite so immortal as a government program.


2 posted on 04/23/2014 3:56:44 AM PDT by SES1066 (Quality, Speed or Economical - Any 2 of 3 except in government - 1 at best but never #3!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

This article actually suggests the EPA actually can recognize reality ... but then the source, the AP, doesn’t recognize reality either.


3 posted on 04/23/2014 4:38:19 AM PDT by Amagi (Lenin: "Socialized Medicine is the Keystone to the Arch of the Socialist State.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

They are NOT recognizing reality.

Reality:
The EPA on Tuesday said it was basing its 2013 standard on the 810,185 ethanol-equivalent gallons produced with nonfood plants last year.

EPA:
The EPA is proposing 17 million gallons as a target for 2014. The law required 1.75 billion gallons.

Change from complete nonsense to only utter nonsense is not recognizing reality. They are requiring the oil/gasoline companies to use more than 20 time the amount that exists.


4 posted on 04/23/2014 4:58:03 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Biofuels research, like a lot of research, generates huge amounts of what are basically waste products.

Scaling up research methods to all-out production yields a frightful amount of physical waste that is very expensive to dispose of, not to mention the required waste storage space and regulations.


5 posted on 04/23/2014 5:06:54 AM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

The 810,185 number appears to be way off. I suspect .81 billion would be more like it.
Disclaimer: I am no fan of ethanol.


6 posted on 04/23/2014 5:49:44 AM PDT by roninoronoco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roninoronoco

That is for the production of ethanol from cellulose material, not corn or other sugar sources.


7 posted on 04/23/2014 6:14:58 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson