I love the internet, but I am not sure it should be consider a natural “right” along with others.
I guess you could lump it into freedom of expression and assembly.
But really..a fundamental right?
Kerry is a Klown.
Indeed, but that is what the progressive klowns do. Liberal klowns are quite sure that if they enact enough laws they can improve on the founders notion of natural law.
Liberals remind me of this story.
An old Indian Chief sat in his hut on the reservations, smoking a Ceremonial Pipe and eying two U.S. Government officials sent to interview him. "Chief Two Eagles" asked one official, "You have observed the white man for 90 years. Youve seen his wars and his technological advances. Youve seen his progress, and the damage he's done.
The Chief nodded in agreement.
The Official continued, "Considering all these events, in your opinion, where did the white man go wrong?
The Chief stared at the Government Officials for over a minute and then calmly replied, "When white man found this land, Indians were running it."
"No taxes."
"No debt."
"Plenty buffalo."
"Plenty beaver."
"Women did all the work."
"Medicine man free."
"Indian man spent all day hunting and fishing."
"All night having sex."
Then Chief leaned back and smiled, "Only white man dumb enough to think he could improve system like that."
A true fundamental right is freedom from all looney liberal comments, orders, words, and biases.
I’m good with it being a fundamental right. That means it should be free. You can’t charge for fundamental rights. Maybe Holder will tell Cox Cable that they have to provide my internet for free......