The phrase “best interests of the Association” is rather wide and subjective —
He might just deem that having Magic Johnson as owner of the Clippers is in the “best interest of the Association”.
Or keeping LeBron James from sitting out next season is in the “best interests of the Association”.
The owners had better take note — they may be next
It certainly is. And all the owners signed off on it so they have to abide by what Silver decides what constitutes best interest.
He might just deem that having Magic Johnson as owner of the Clippers is in the “best interest of the Association”.
Silver doesn't have the power to strip an owner of his team. That requires the other owners to agree. While Article 24 gives Silver broad discretion on levying sanctions on infractions not covered in other areas and deciding 'best interest of the Association', it also limits the punishments he can impose.
Or keeping LeBron James from sitting out next season is in the “best interests of the Association”.
That falls under Section 36 and yes, he could suspend any player for infractions he deems are against the best interests of the NBA. Fine's lower though - $50,000 max.
The owners had better take note — they may be next
Which is why I don't see enough owners voting to strip Sterling of his team.