How Justices Kagan and Roberts Characterize Justice Sotomayor’s Dissent

Josh Blackman ^ | Josh Blackman

[Lurking Libertarian]

It makes it even more devastating to the “WISE LATINA” to be so criticized by Kagan, while Scalia is with her on the law.

Scalia agreed with Kagan as to the result, but not her reasoning. On the other hand, Thomas joined Sotomayor's opinion. Buckeye Texan described this opinion as "cats and dogs living together."

[BuckeyeTexan]

Cats and dogs indeed. Round and round they go, where they’ll stop nobody knows.

[SoFloFreeper]

Really? The two appointees of the Clown are in sharp disagreement?? I am stuned.

[SoFloFreeper]

Rather unusual? Man, that is the weirdest lineup to say the least.

Sotomayor and Thomas on the same side??? Hmmm.

And a rare moment when Scalia and Thomas reach a different conclusion.

Wow.

[21twelve]

“Legal immigration shouldn’t be a byzantine system.”

Just like healthcare where it “used to be” difficult and “expensive”. And “everyone” agreed that it could be done better and nobody should be excluded under a system that was so complex and difficult to navigate.

So - free immigration for everyone!

[az wildkitten]

That is what I had hoped I expressed, but I guess not.

[dennisw]

What a shock this crypto-lesbo latina smurf doll would vote for her “la raza”. And this is the only time she has been called “doll” in her life

[hoosiermama]

As confusing as “who’s on first ...”

[Durus]

That’s among the most ridiculous straw-man arguments I’ve ever read on FR. Congratulations or my condolences, whichever you prefer.