Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: riverss

Yeah. The tyrant and his party were generally ambivalent about slavery. Slavery in the north didn’t end until after the war.


55 posted on 06/18/2014 5:44:44 PM PDT by RKBA Democrat (Be a part of the American freedom migration: freestateproject.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: RKBA Democrat

That’s one of the grosser distortions of the truth that I’ve seen on the WBTS threads.

First of all slavery had been eliminated in almost every northern state, and the states that still had allowed it had paths to its elimination. It really was largely symbolic though since the slave population in the north was but a tiny fraction of the slave population in the south.

By contrast the southern states not only embraced slavery, they doubled-down on their exploitation of other human beings. They had no intention of ever letting go of their human chattel and would destroy anyone or anything that stood in their way.

The true tyrants were the southron slavers.


56 posted on 06/18/2014 7:23:29 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson