Your history is flawed here.
Saddam was actively supporting and driving world terror and Gaddafi was doing the same and he also was very close to building a nuclear bomb.
Whoops! hit ‘post’ too soon.
George Bush did not wake up one morning and say “Saddam tried to kill dad, I will kill him” regardless of what the dems want people to think. It was not about oil either.
I suggest people do a Google search using the words “Clinton Saddam regime change’
The entire world thought he was developing chemical, biological and nuclear weapons.
Clinton would draw a line, Saddam would cross. Clinton drew another line, Saddam crossed and on & on & on.
George Bush drew a line and gave Saddam a chance to comply. Saddam did not comply. Bush acted.
Had Clinton kept to his word and did what Bush did, I have no doubt he would be considered a hero to this day.
Show me the links to your claims, if you will please.
None of the 911 terrorists were Iraqi’s or Libyans.
After Reagan bombed Gaddafi’s tent, he was a different man.
He was acquiring nuclear technology? Who is’nt?
7 countries have plenty of nukes. So who says any sovereign country can not develop nuclear technology? It is OK for N. Korea to have it but not Libya?
Most were Saudi’s and from rich families.
Bush-41 attacked Saddam after he conquered Kuwait.
To quote Hillary “What difference does it make” who owns the oil? They all must sell it!