Posted on 07/04/2014 12:27:26 PM PDT by equalator
When you have judges like the 9th circuit fools, yes, you tend to want to bypass their idiocy.
“What was he rrying to protect her from?”
He initially grabbed her to keep her from walking out into oncoming traffic.
Very, very good catch!
Who defended the soldiers?
Maybe you need to read some Jefferson.
“He initially grabbed her to keep her from walking out into oncoming traffic.”
Please don’t try and inject any sort of objective investigation.
Lynch mob emotion is all that is allowed. Not facts or rational analytic investigation.
/johnny
And you want more of the same to happen to him.
Yes. We seem to have an unspoken pact with them. We report the news abt their muzzie problem that their media won’t report, and they report some of our more polticall “incorrect” news that our media won’t report.
Scumbag bastard.
/johnny
/johnny
Yes let's rationalize a muscle-bound 300-pound cop straddling a woman while pounding her face into the concrete while she's putting her hands in front of her face. Good thinking.
That would be Huber right
Now watch the FOP defend this sub animal
The guilty go free and the innocent are punished. That’s that you are wanting. If cops ever want to know why they are hated and not trusted, use this as an example.
In order to turn around a civilization that is completely lawless, I advocate all manner of things.
He's not doing his duty.
You can't uphold the law by breaking the law.
/johnny
LAPD .... your tax dollars at work....against you!
No. The British, Canadian and others report what you will not get from our lockstep domestic news.
It’s not hard to figure out.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.