Skip to comments.
Why Aren't There More Gay People?
The Federalist ^
| July 21, 2014
| Robert Tracinski
Posted on 07/22/2014 4:41:56 AM PDT by right-wing agnostic
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-85 next last
To: right-wing agnostic
"For the moderate left,..." "Moderate left" is an oxymoron - doesn't exist.
21
posted on
07/22/2014 5:22:29 AM PDT
by
newfreep
(at)
To: right-wing agnostic
Dead Enders reach the Dead End. Recruitment via pedophelia keeps the perversion alive to a fringe level.
22
posted on
07/22/2014 5:24:07 AM PDT
by
TADSLOS
(The Event Horizon has come and gone. Buckle up and hang on.)
To: right-wing agnostic
If this is true:
"Hence one of the well-noted contradictions of the left: that marriage is only something to be celebrated when gay people do it. To these leftists, homosexuals are only interesting insofar as they can be used as an instrument of subversion."
Then
"Perhaps its time to spend a little less time worrying about gay marriage and more time worrying about plain old regular marriage, among other cultural disasters."
this statement doesn't make much sense. Worrying about gay marriage is worrying about plain old regular marriage because gay marriage is being used to subvert regular marriage.
23
posted on
07/22/2014 5:25:53 AM PDT
by
chrisser
(Senseless legislation does nothing to solve senseless violence.)
To: equalator
This country certainly is.
24
posted on
07/22/2014 5:30:01 AM PDT
by
cdcdawg
To: chrisser; Mrs. Don-o
Worrying about gay marriage is worrying about plain old regular marriage ...I agree. Homosexual "marriage" is sterile, rarely exclusive, and usually of short duration. These are pathologies of legitimate marriage, not beneficial elements.
As Mrs. Don-o says, heterosexuals invented gay marriage. Homosexuals' participation is a late, but surely reasonable, development.
25
posted on
07/22/2014 5:37:55 AM PDT
by
Tax-chick
(No power in the 'verse can stop me.)
To: right-wing agnostic
A man’s rear end cannot compare with what a woman has.
To: Citizen Tom Paine
Shouldn’t the title be “Thank Goodness there aren’t more “gay” people”?
27
posted on
07/22/2014 5:53:32 AM PDT
by
hal ogen
(First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
To: chrisser
28
posted on
07/22/2014 5:59:36 AM PDT
by
rlmorel
("A nation, despicable by it"s weakness, forfeits even the privilege of being neutral." A. Hamilton)
To: GOP_Party_Animal
... public awareness and acceptance of homosexuality has grown by leaps and bounds, yet none of this seems to have made any converts. It's a big step, not taken lightly, and probably involves some bridge-burning.
29
posted on
07/22/2014 6:05:44 AM PDT
by
Rummyfan
(Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
To: Vendome
Reproduction, or lack thereof could be an issue.
To: right-wing agnostic
To answer the headline; it is because homosexuality is not one of the more common mental illnesses.
31
posted on
07/22/2014 6:11:34 AM PDT
by
Jay Redhawk
(Has Uncle Sam ran away with Lady Liberty?)
To: Tax-chick
The data suggests that the number of people experimenting with homosexuality (bisexuals) has exploded 300%... but still is a small number (1.1% among young adults compared to .3% among middle-aged adults.) Either that, or most bisexuals go straight.
32
posted on
07/22/2014 6:13:13 AM PDT
by
dangus
To: equalator
One thing I find particularly disturbing is the current effort to push the idea that gays are better at raising children than heterosexuals. I find that so strange that I cannot even think of a good comparison to any other strange idea. Certainly no homosexual couple, either male or female, can produce a child on their own so what on Earth would make anyone fantasize that they could do a better job of raising a child? I have even heard a married woman talk to a gay man about the idea that a gay man would make a great nanny. Sick, sick, sick. Anyone who harbors such notions should search on the name of Jesse Dirkhising but if you don’t already know the story be forewarned that you may need to have a large bucket handy when you do read it and you may suffer psychological damage. I am a man of mature years who has been through a considerable amount of pain in the past and survived but when first exposed to the story I literally wanted to cry like a baby.
33
posted on
07/22/2014 6:14:26 AM PDT
by
RipSawyer
(OPM is the religion of the sheeple.)
To: right-wing agnostic
Why Aren’t There More Gay People?
There aren’t any. HOMOSEXUAL, because there’s nothing GAY about it.
34
posted on
07/22/2014 6:22:56 AM PDT
by
JimRed
(Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
To: JimRed
Homos are simply a weapon for the anti-Christian left.
35
posted on
07/22/2014 6:24:00 AM PDT
by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: elcid1970
To: right-wing agnostic
My son asked me why are there no more Unicorns? I said because they were gay.....
To: right-wing agnostic
The number of people that have had a homosexual encounter is closer to 30%. Most don’t stick with it, but that is the number that is rising and that is a major public health concern. The study that showed 2% was a self-identification study, not a behavior study.
To: baddog 219
Unicorns & rainbows go so well together!
;^)
39
posted on
07/22/2014 6:55:26 AM PDT
by
elcid1970
("In the modern world, Muslims are living fossils.")
To: Vendome
LOL, can’t top that....won’t even try.
40
posted on
07/22/2014 6:57:28 AM PDT
by
CatherineofAragon
((Support Christian white males---the architects of the jewel known as Western Civilization).)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-85 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson