Skip to comments.Sarah Palin launches online channel as she rips ‘media filters’
Posted on 07/28/2014 5:29:44 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network
In a Sunday video, the former Republican vice presidential nominee announced the Sarah Palin Channel, a subscription-based Web site that she says will offer news, video chats with her and behind-the-scenes glimpses of speeches and political events she attends.
(please see link for full details)
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
Link to the new Palin channel:
Very top of her new website:
National debt. Currently 17.798 trillion dollars. And growing.
Using the Glenn Beck money-making model.
Why not milk your fervent followers for all you can?
I have encountered plenty of subscription-based websites thus far, and thus far none have really drawn me past just looking.
Coast to Coast, I listen regularly, but no thanks.
Glenn Beck, no thanks.
Rush Limbaugh, tempting but no.
There are other competitors out there, but this is the first one I will have to literally stop to decide whether or not I would like to subscribe.
Another link to the website, just for the heck of it:
Destined for failure.
I think so too....
I don’t think so.
It is rather low-cost to start a pay website. The issue will be providing the programming.
She has a no-cost way to subscribe.
I haven’t yet, but I’m just saying. Palin has a huge fan base.
I assumed that Sarah had a huge fan base too because she is so well loved here at FR. I asked some of my girl friends what they thought about her I got everything from an OK to a wrinkled up nose and a head shaking NO. None of these women are liberals. I think the media ruin her and I wonder if she can come back or does she want to come back.
I really like Sarah Palin but...
$4.95 a month, maybe. $9.99 a month, nope.
I’d rather give it to FR. And I’m going to do it right now.
Where’s the donate button? Ah, here it is.
Even some conservative women are jealous of beautiful intelligent conservative women.
I think Palin needs to reach out more to women, though part of her problem I believe had been she was young, pretty and successful and some women just rejected her on that basis.
Palin’s added a couple of years. She has a family. I believe she is gaining female fans, and could run a successful campaign in 2016.
I recognize your point, but I think that was partly just because she had so much going for her.
She’s still very pretty, but no longer that “must attack” pretty she was. I think her female fan club will grow by quite a bit, as she stands firm on issues (virtually alone thus far).
I agree - $4.95 a month is doable - $9.99 - not so much.
Please! Every time some yahoo from the media or even here on FR predicts that Sarah is going to fail, she usually succeeds or just simply keeps moving forward. Heck, there are going to be rabid liberals and GOP elite hacks signing up just so they can write nasty things about or to her. She doesn’t care and will continue to speak the truth. You can cancel at any time and there is already a lot of content available and more to come
I could handle $4.95/mo.
Rush is something like $4.00/mo., and I’ve been a subscriber for years.
$100/year is high, IMO.
I wish Sarah luck with this newest venture...but, many may be priced out, from the get go.
Just saying Rush Limbaugh, and George Noory are both (I believe) charging $15 / month.
So she’s already discounting, from her competitors.
No I take that back.
Sorry. My mistake.
What’s the refund policy when she quits?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.