Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Lazamataz

Yeah, and how long did that last? :’) Nappy was actually a much better civil leader than he was a military one, if one goes by the results. His victories were early and kicked the British behinds until after he led 500,000 or so to the slaughter in that brutal Russian winter. What a jackass, eh? He loved the trappings of ancient glory, but apparently didn’t learn from the experience of the Persians, described in Herodotus, when they tried cornering the Scythians in what would eventually be the Russian empire.

The French monarchy was *the* power on the European continent for centuries. The Spanish had their huge empire, and during their union with the Hapsburgs the Spanish monarch controlled more of the world’s surface than anyone who has ever lived.

And yet, the Spanish never took on the French or at least not for long, or effectively.

Ivan the Terrible built his military machine by sending people to study French methods.

And much more recently, it was the French who figured out what needed to be done and how men needed to be trained in order to beat the Germans in WWone, but lacked the manpower to do it — so they were the key to the US’ Expeditionary Force’s record-time recruiting and deployment, and made a definite though under-credited contribution to the ultimate victory.


65 posted on 08/03/2014 3:26:02 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: SunkenCiv

Actually the Germans were the ones who figured it out
but by then they too were in no shape to continue.


70 posted on 08/03/2014 3:33:42 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson