[Yashcheritsiy]

What's the problem here? She publicly insults the school on her feed, she tags them on the post in a way that can easily be construed as taunting them, and then she's surprised when they tell her to take her kid somewhere else? They're a private entity - they can choose who schools there and who doesn't. End of story.

[Morgana]

She had paid for the service, that’s the problem.

[Wyrd bið ful aræd]

Entitled or not, the school people are still major-league A-holes. And there may be some question as to whether they can take payment for service then deny service, although I assume that sort of thing is covered in the small print someplace.

[Sivad]

“End of story.”

Well, true, but mom got her some face time on FOX. The
private pre-school fired the 4 yr old because mom went
social network with her gripes. They didn’t like the
bad pub and had the right to toss the kid. But, if
avoiding bad PR was their motive then they might have
made it worse on themselves. What could make them
think mom was just going to go away? My money is on
the pre-school developing some new ways of handling
irate parents.

[leapfrog0202]

What’s the problem here? She publicly insults the school on her feed, she tags them on the post in a way that can easily be construed as taunting them, and then she’s surprised when they tell her to take her kid somewhere else? They’re a private entity - they can choose who schools there and who doesn’t. End of story.

---

Absolutely agree with you! If she didn’t tag them, that would be different, but she was flaunting what she said, almost as if she was daring them to respond.