Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv

If there was a known similar particle (this “tehcni-Higgs” particle) why wasn’t that ruled out before publication of any findings?


18 posted on 11/09/2014 5:54:47 PM PST by bajabaja (Too ugly to be scanned at the airports.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: bajabaja

I think I wound up having to edit it out of the excerpt, but the Higgs was predicted (actually needed, it’s a mathematical kludge) by the Standard Model; so were massless neutrinos. Since the late 1960s several longterm experiments were set up to detect neutrinos, and failed to turn up any (for all practical purposes; the level of apparent hits was the kind of background level one would expect to find in interstellar space). Since the Sun is quite close by, we should be awash in them.

Then about ten years ago, a really purpose-built experiment was begun. It appeared to find neutrinos. Unfortunately the detected whatevers had mass.

Soooo, it was decided that neutrinos had been found after all, but that they changed from massless to massful while making the trip from the Sun. Standard Model was upheld.


26 posted on 11/09/2014 6:18:34 PM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______________________Celebrate the Polls, Ignore the Trolls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson