1 posted on
02/01/2015 8:24:31 AM PST by
dennisw
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-26 last
To: dennisw
Moron, I guess he never saw the movie “ Wicker Man “
37 posted on
02/01/2015 10:18:34 AM PST by
VTenigma
(The Democratic party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
To: dennisw
Generally speaking, wood framed structures are limited to 35 to 65 ft in height, depending upon specific type of structure and seismic design category.
Economics usually prevail resulting in Steel frame systems.
40 posted on
02/01/2015 10:28:44 AM PST by
Cvengr
( Adversity in life & death is inevitable; Stress is optional through faith in Christ.)
To: dennisw
Gee, what could possibly go wrong? I hope Al-Qaeda doesn't hear about this...
42 posted on
02/01/2015 10:43:44 AM PST by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: dennisw
.
Let’s take all the idiots that are concerned about a “carbon footprint” and just ‘assist’ their suicide.
.
44 posted on
02/01/2015 10:52:22 AM PST by
editor-surveyor
(Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
To: dennisw
So he wants to address rising C02 by destroying millions of trees that convert the C02 to oxygen while at the same time creating huge fire traps? Sounds perfectly logical to me.
48 posted on
02/01/2015 12:21:23 PM PST by
Mastador1
(I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
To: dennisw
What if no one cares about their carbon footprint.
It is a phony construct to trap the middle class.
50 posted on
02/01/2015 5:31:56 PM PST by
Chickensoup
(Leftist totalitarian fascism is on the move.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-26 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson