Highest military court????
R.
1 posted on
02/23/2015 5:34:34 PM PST by
Rabin
To: Rabin
"offensive touching to which his sexual partners did not provide meaningful informed consent". It also upheld his conviction for adultery, even though his wife participated.I don't even want to know.
2 posted on
02/23/2015 5:37:27 PM PST by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: Rabin
The court upheld for "offensive touching to which his sexual partners did not provide meaningful informed consent". And the homofascists are trying to repeal all legal requirements that HIV positive men notify their sex partners. Consent? Only men engaging in sex with women need to do that, there's a War on Women don't you know???
3 posted on
02/23/2015 5:37:56 PM PST by
a fool in paradise
(Shickl-Gruber's Big Lie gave us Hussein's Un-Affordable Care act (HUAC).)
To: Rabin
4 posted on
02/23/2015 5:43:23 PM PST by
PAR35
To: Rabin
This is the direct and expected result of removing any sense of morality from our armed services.
To: Rabin
When asked for its opinion, the airman’s pet goat was heard to say, “Baaaaaah....”
To: Rabin; blueyon; KitJ; T Minus Four; xzins; CMS; The Sailor; ab01; txradioguy; Jet Jaguar; ...
To: Rabin
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson