Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Swordmaker
But the conditions are not at all analogous. Apple has not ever had a high market share, yet has 93% of the last quarter of 2014 of ALL phone profits.

If you exclude the app-less wonders like Blackberry, Symbian and Palm OS, which are more feature phones+, these are the market shares for smartphones from 2007 onwards:

Year Android (Google) iOS (Apple) Windows Mobile/Phone (Microsoft)
2007[97] 0.00% 18.33% 81.67%
2008[97] 0.00% 40.90% 59.10%
2009[98] 14.55% 53.27% 32.17%
2010[99] 53.26% 36.93% 9.81%
2011[100] 69.13% 28.11% 2.76%
2012[101] 75.43% 21.74% 2.83%
2013[101] 80.68% 16.04% 3.28%
2014 Q1[102] 82.11% 15.67% 2.22%
2014 Q2[103][104] 83.31% 14.28% 2.42%
2014 Q3[87] 84.12% 12.85% 3.04%

79 posted on 04/12/2015 4:56:42 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]


To: Zhang Fei
If you exclude the app-less wonders like Blackberry, Symbian and Palm OS, which are more feature phones+, these are the market shares for smartphones from 2007 onwards:

Except it has been proved that the figures for "Android (Google)" were NOT all smartphones, because they include all Android phones, Zhang Fei. The numbers reported for the makers of Android phones report all the phones they make. . . smart phones, feature phones, and just plain phones.

In 2013, in the Apple v. Samsung trial, Judge Lucy Koh forced Samsung to reveal their Android phone product mix. It turned out Samsung made 30% Android smart phones, 40% Android feature phones, and 30% Android plain phones. Economic researchers have taken that bit of information and researched the other major Android manufacturers and found the mix pretty close was mirrored by all of them because it was forced by market forces—yet their statistics are all merely reported under Android phones—and invariably that gets reported as Android smartphones.

The researchers also found that many of the smaller Android phone makers do not even make smartphones, but concentrate their product lines on the mid range to low-end plain phone market for the third world. In other words, Zhang, most of those "Other" phones made by "White Box Cellphone makers" are not even smartphones, and the Android "smartphone" market is extraordinarily inflated, both in numbers and in percentages. The actual percentage of SMARTPHONES is something less than 30% of that percentage of Android (Google), while the rest of the Android (Google) percentage is made of those Feature and plain phones.

Besides, your chart is total twaddle when it states that in 2010, Android phones had 53.26% of the market and Apple had 39.93% while Windows Mobile had 9.81%. . . WHERE ARE RIM's and NOKIA's 70% PLUS OF THE SMARTPHONE MARKET IN 2010????

Your chart is garbage. You can't just make up "facts" like Blackberry, Symbian are "APP-LESS" when they were not! Android was just getting STARTED in 2010 and yes Android was growing rapidly, but there is NO WAY they had garnered 53% of the market by 2010. . . I don't know where you got this junk but that's what it is. . . junk. Your chart shows Apple taking second place in 2010 excluding RIM and Nokia, but the actual historic record shows that only occurred in August of 2011.

87 posted on 04/12/2015 6:14:42 PM PDT by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users contnue...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson