Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ethicist Peter Singer Says Don't Pay to Treat Disabled Babies
Evolution News and Views ^ | May 12, 2015 | Wesley J. Smith

Posted on 05/13/2015 5:25:45 AM PDT by Heartlander

Ethicist Peter Singer Says Don't Pay to Treat Disabled Babies

Wesley J. Smith May 12, 2015 7:16 PM | Permalink

Peter Singer is a bigot. Rather than believing in universal human equality, he would invidiously measure the capacities of human beings to determine whether they are "persons."

Those with insufficient capacities are to be deemed human "non-persons," of lesser moral value, and hence, potentially subject to both killing and objectification for harvesting, medical experimentation, etc.

He also supports health care rationing based on quality of life. This blatant medical discrimination would victimize babies born with severe disabilities -- whose care, Singer argues, should not be paid by national health insurance schemes.

The National Council on Disability is not amused. From its press release:

On Sunday April 16, contentious Princeton Professor Peter Singer, once again argued that it is "reasonable" for the government or private insurance companies to deny treatment to infants with disabilities. Singer's remarks were made on "Aaron Klein Investigative Radio," which is broadcast on New York's AM 970 and Philadelphia 990 AM.

In the interview, which was perhaps ironically conducted as part of a press tour Singer is currently on promoting his new book about charities, "The Most Good You Can Do: How Effective Altruism Is Changing Ideas About Living Ethically," the professor advocated the shocking claim that health care laws like the Affordable Care Act should be more overt about rationing and that we should acknowledge the necessity of "intentionally ending the lives of severely disabled infants."

"Mr. Charity" then makes an uncharitable utilitarian assertion:

Without offering any concrete measure on how quality of life could or should be determined, Singer admitted, "I don't want my health insurance premiums to be higher so that infants who can experience zero quality of life can have expensive treatments."

The NDC makes a point about Singer that is also lost on the media slavishly pushing assisted suicide/euthanasia, which also threatens the lives and bodily integrity of people with disabilities:

Increasingly, negative predictions of quality of life have little to do with the actual life experiences of people with disabilities. People with disabilities commonly report more satisfaction with their lives than others might expect. Though it might surprise Singer and those with limited imaginations, even people with disabilities who encounter obstacles, prejudice, and discrimination, derive satisfaction and pleasure from their lives.

Singer is something of the ethicist-in-chief for such organs as the New York Times and leftist columnists like Nicholas Kristof. That tells you a lot about a certain brand of ideological thinking, it seems to me.

Advocates of that way of thinking talk a good game on equality, but when it comes to people with disabilities (among other categories of human life), they don't really mean it. When they support Peter Singer, that's what they demonstrate.



TOPICS: Education; Health/Medicine; Society
KEYWORDS: abortion; deathpanels; obamacare; petersinger; zerocare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 05/13/2015 5:25:45 AM PDT by Heartlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Heartlander

Peter Singer is a very sick individual.


2 posted on 05/13/2015 5:29:34 AM PDT by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo....Sum Pro Vita - Modified Descartes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Heartlander

I wonder how the Left would react if Pete followed up by adding “And abolish welfare. Let them starve if they can’t hold a job”?


3 posted on 05/13/2015 5:30:51 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Heartlander

I guess it depends on who is paying. Parents should definitely pay.


4 posted on 05/13/2015 5:32:00 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Heartlander

This man deserves a special spot in hell.


5 posted on 05/13/2015 5:37:12 AM PDT by Hyman Roth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Heartlander

This a**hole sure seems to have it in for disabled kids, doesn’t he... Mengele would be proud.


6 posted on 05/13/2015 5:38:27 AM PDT by ScottinVA (Hillary is nothing more than a white, wrinkled form of Obama in pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

And if they can’t pay?


7 posted on 05/13/2015 5:39:31 AM PDT by miss marmelstein (Richard the Third: "I should like to drive away not only the Turks (moslims) but all my foes.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Heartlander

Ethicist? Who gave him that title? I find nothing ethical about Peter Singer, and the fact that he lays claim to an appellation he does not deserve doesn’t make him any more of an authority on that subject than the busker on the corner.


8 posted on 05/13/2015 5:40:43 AM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SumProVita
Singer is sick, but his position is the logical end of the pro abort crowd. Once you concede to the murder the fine details don't matter much.
9 posted on 05/13/2015 5:44:09 AM PDT by fungoking (Tis a pleasure to live in the Ozarks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Heartlander

DEFUND socialists/totalitarians and their sycophants/collectives, foreign and domestic.

Socialism Is Legal Plunder - Bastiat

http://www.usdebtclock.org


10 posted on 05/13/2015 5:47:52 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Heartlander

Jesus says, “Blessed are the merciful, for they shall receive mercy.” (Matthew 5:7) Those who show no mercy on earth, will beg for mercy in Hell, but there will be none.


11 posted on 05/13/2015 5:50:32 AM PDT by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Heartlander

Ethicist? He could have found a job in 1938 Germany. He’s an obvious modern democrat, or what used to be known as a national socialist.


12 posted on 05/13/2015 5:56:32 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Heartlander

Irony would be that one of these severely disabled kids grows up to create a cure for whatever is killing this old commie.


13 posted on 05/13/2015 6:02:33 AM PDT by IYAS9YAS (Has anyone seen my tagline? It was here yesterday. I seem to have misplaced it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Heartlander

Nazi ethics.


14 posted on 05/13/2015 6:10:11 AM PDT by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Heartlander

How about not paying to treat insane college professors?


15 posted on 05/13/2015 6:17:23 AM PDT by MIchaelTArchangel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txrefugee

mercy won’t even be a concept in hell. just total evil, fear, hate, anger, etc.


16 posted on 05/13/2015 6:19:10 AM PDT by huldah1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

Just the beginning stages of “ethics” accrued when the government, or more precisely the thieves in government, decide what to pay for in health care.


17 posted on 05/13/2015 6:24:13 AM PDT by ez (Abashed the devil stood and felt how awful goodness is... - Milton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Heartlander

Ten years ago Singer was sitting on the sidelines with no political power and not really of concern. Now that the government has taken over health care and shown an inclination to force their social agenda down our throats, we need to be really, really concerned.


18 posted on 05/13/2015 6:31:44 AM PDT by the_Watchman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

He would have killed Charles Steinmetz I am sure. Steinmetz was born deformed a Hunchback,Dwarf,with Hip Dysplasia but without him we still might never have developed power to light whole cities. Charles Proteus Steinmetz
Charlesproteussteinmetz.jpg
Born Karl August Rudolph Steinmetz
April 9, 1865
Breslau, Province of Silesia, Prussia
Died October 26, 1923 (aged 58)
Schenectady, New York, United States
Occupation Mathematician and electrical engineer
Known for Alternating current
Electric power industry
Hysteresis
Steinmetz equivalent circuit
Mechanicville Hydroelectric Plant
Metal-halide lamp
Network synthesis filters
Passive analogue filter development
Phasor measurement unit
Steinmetz solid
Transmission line
Wireless power
Engineering education
Parent(s) Karl Heinrich Steinmetz
Awards Elliott Cresson Medal (1913) more on him http://www.browsebiography.com/bio-charles_steinmetz.html


19 posted on 05/13/2015 6:48:36 AM PDT by ABN 505
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ABN 505

Great stuff... Thanks!


20 posted on 05/13/2015 7:09:03 AM PDT by ScottinVA (The election of Obama was a hate crime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson