Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: The_Victor; buffaloguy; SunkenCiv

What amazes me about Roman amphoras is how big some of them are. 80 gallons or better. Yet the handles seem relatively small. The pottery must be stronger than I imagine to support that weight without the handles snapping off.


14 posted on 06/01/2015 11:21:21 AM PDT by TigersEye (If You Are Ignorant, Don't Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: TigersEye

I’m not sure if there’s been a correlation made between the sizes and their former contents, but there hasn’t been much study of that, it’s kind of new. The amphorae were also very often used but one time, IOW, they weren’t practicing sustainable clay technology. No wonder the Roman Empire only lasted from the conquest of Ostia (5th c BC) until the fall of Constantinople (AD 1453). ;’)


16 posted on 06/01/2015 11:27:59 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (What do we want? REGIME CHANGE! When do we want it? NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: TigersEye
What amazes me about Roman amphoras is how big some of them are. 80 gallons or better. Yet the handles seem relatively small. The pottery must be stronger than I imagine to support that weight without the handles snapping off.

That brings up how the amphora were handled on the docks too. It won't stand upright by itself, so what did they do to secure them on the wharf?

It just seems cumbersome to me.

18 posted on 06/01/2015 11:36:06 AM PDT by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson