Bump
To: Cringing Negativism Network
To: Cringing Negativism Network
Don’t worry about Trump’s numbers against Democrats, he hasn’t started campaigning against them, or towards their voters. Reagan had the same numbers (maybe worse) in 1979.
Being 12 points down against The Wildebeest at this point is actually pretty darn good so far.
3 posted on
07/30/2015 4:19:10 AM PDT by
BobL
(REPUBLICANS - Fight for the WHITE VOTE...and you will win (see my 'profile' page))
To: Cringing Negativism Network
Trump doubled up on JebBer again.
4 posted on
07/30/2015 4:22:43 AM PDT by
Red Steel
(Ted Cruz: 'I'm a Big Fan of Donald Trump')
To: Cringing Negativism Network
Bombastic? LOL... The libs really are scared.
6 posted on
07/30/2015 4:26:34 AM PDT by
BigEdLB
(They need to target the 'Ministry of Virtue' which has nothing to do with virtue.)
To: Cringing Negativism Network
Ind 34, Dem 30, Rep 26.... The first thing I look at.
Besides : The gender gap explains the whole difference. If Trump gains 7 points (switch) overall with both men and women he will cover it. This is registered voters. Likely would br +3 more Rep. Men Trump +1 Women Clinton +24 I can easily see it being Men Trump +15 Women Clinton +10 eventually particularly if Trump has a female VP like Fiorina...
10 posted on
07/30/2015 4:38:59 AM PDT by
BigEdLB
(They need to target the 'Ministry of Virtue' which has nothing to do with virtue.)
To: Cringing Negativism Network
Quinnipiac = Clinton Pollsters
Remembering this adds perspective campaign season after campaign season.
12 posted on
07/30/2015 4:52:02 AM PDT by
OrangeHoof
(SECEDE TEXAS!! If not now, when?)
To: Cringing Negativism Network
So many though are for Jebbie because they know only him and Trump, and Jebbie will become the repository of “anti-Trump” voters.
14 posted on
07/30/2015 4:57:34 AM PDT by
Theodore R.
(Liberals keep winning; so the American people must now be all-liberal all the time.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson