Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Revealed: Russian-Built Kilo Submarine 'Kills' American Nuclear Sub
National Interest ^ | December 1, 2015 | Dave Majumdar

Posted on 12/01/2015 11:15:10 AM PST by C19fan

The Indian media is claiming that one of New Delhi’s Russian-built Kilo-class diesel-electric attack submarines managed to “sink” a nuclear-powered U.S. Navy Los Angeles-class attack submarine during exercises in October.

(Excerpt) Read more at nationalinterest.org ...


TOPICS: Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: submarines
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
I think this is BS. No way an export version of a 1980s Soviet diesel could take out a LA class SSN.
1 posted on 12/01/2015 11:15:10 AM PST by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Sounds unlikely, unless it was just “given” to them... for whatever reason...


2 posted on 12/01/2015 11:16:42 AM PST by OKSooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
"I think this is BS. No way - - "

Then again, with our military now being an engine for social change rather than an organization for the actual defense of America, can we afford to be so smug?

3 posted on 12/01/2015 11:19:38 AM PST by buckalfa (I am feeling much better now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

After reading the article, the big question is how did they record the US boat’s powerplant noises so they would know what to look for? Sounds to me like the LA class was giving off exaggerated noise, and gave that noise to the Indians, as a tracking exercise.


4 posted on 12/01/2015 11:24:49 AM PST by afsnco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

LA class is from the early 70s. It is why we have been replacing them with the Virginia Class for years. Over a third of those have already been retired.


5 posted on 12/01/2015 11:25:53 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

I know zero about boats, but I know a lot about war games.

It’s all about the rules and the missions.

You can set up scenarios where F4s wing against F22s.

Sometimes this is about learning. Often it is about making a less powerful country feel good about itself.


6 posted on 12/01/2015 11:26:01 AM PST by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Possible, but they’re just-make believe, political, ally friendly war exercises. In a real time situation, let’s see this happen which I doubt. This like having a 1998 Honda Civic beating a porsche 911 carrera GT lol


7 posted on 12/01/2015 11:27:22 AM PST by max americana (fired every liberal in our company at every election cycle..and laughed at their faces (true story))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan; OKSooner; buckalfa

Sorry folks, but a diesel on its battery is very quiet and very dangerous. That is why we need anti-submarine warfare aircraft. This is not unexpected.


8 posted on 12/01/2015 11:27:27 AM PST by SubMareener (Save us from Quarterly Freepathons! Become a MONTHLY DONOR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Wait a minute I need to check with DOD. I am on hold with DOD support staff menber Rajeesh right now.


9 posted on 12/01/2015 11:27:31 AM PST by Cyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: SubMareener

While thats true, what are the real world scenarios where a US nuke sub would end up in a position to lose to a kilo?

Kilos aren’t exactly deep water boats. Probably means the 688 came into the shallows and onto the Kilo’s turf.

Which does happen for intel and spec ops stuff. But not in a scenario like an exercise where the Kilo certainly knew the general area where the 688 was operating.

So I wouldn’t read too much into this. The kill was either a result of restrictive exercise parameters, or a lucky golden bb shot (which do happen ...)


11 posted on 12/01/2015 11:35:00 AM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jewbacca

There can even be strategy in that. (wink)


12 posted on 12/01/2015 11:37:39 AM PST by SaveFerris (Be a blessing to a stranger today for some have entertained angels unaware)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

The military has been known to tank these exercises around budget time. During Cope India a few years back our F-15’s appeared to get schwacked by IAF Sukhois. ThE USAF brass was at the time trying to persuade Congress that we shouldn’t cut the F22 production line. We lost. Congress cut the budget anyway.

India is very formidable in the air & on the water.


13 posted on 12/01/2015 11:47:41 AM PST by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

This was an exercise for training and coordination with a friendly power, and it is entirely dependent on the parameters of this exercise for those purposes. It does not reflect the outcome of an engagement of similar boats in a real world combat scenario.


14 posted on 12/01/2015 11:50:11 AM PST by Navy Patriot (America, a Rule of Mob nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

“Kill” = got within range to launch a torpedo. That’s different from a kill.


15 posted on 12/01/2015 11:53:01 AM PST by AppyPappy (If you really want to irritate someone, point out something obvious they are trying hard to ignore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
I think this is BS. No way an export version of a 1980s Soviet diesel could take out a LA class SSN

No way squinty-eyed little yellow men flying toy planes could TOUCH one of our mighty battleships. No way a bunch of illiterate goat humpers could bomb New York City and kill 3000 people.

Our "invulnerable" Navy is short ships, short men, and VERY short replacement shipbuilding capacity.

16 posted on 12/01/2015 11:56:37 AM PST by Jim Noble (Diseases desperate grown Are by desperate appliance relieved Or not at al)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SubMareener
That is why we need anti-submarine warfare aircraft.

Why would antisubmarine aircraft do better than a submarine?

17 posted on 12/01/2015 11:59:35 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SubMareener; All

Exactly. If the mission was set up such that the Kilo didn’t need to run on diesel during the engagement window, he’s potentially got an advantage.

To get some idea of how quiet a diesel-electric boat is when operating on batteries, go out to your garage, open your car’s hood, and listen to the battery.


18 posted on 12/01/2015 11:59:40 AM PST by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

The best new subs out there are the diesels being manufactured in Europe. Very, very quiet.


19 posted on 12/01/2015 12:01:55 PM PST by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SaveFerris

They got lucky this time. But it should be a wake up call for the USN—we need some new electric boats! Next time, we face Russian Boats they might be full of Russians and they can be very good—that or Germans.


20 posted on 12/01/2015 12:15:34 PM PST by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll Onward! Ride to the sound of the guns!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson