Until the day they say they wished they had a gun to protect themselves when they are too far from a “Safety Zone” protection area.
Yes. I don’t know where I saw it, but I thought then: “Here it comes.”
Expect more of this.
My response would be either, “Too bad I didn’t have my gun, or they never would have gotten away,”
OR
“Good thing I had my gun. Now they won’t be able to rob or harm anyone else.”
https://youtu.be/TM8L7bdwVaA
Journalists and reports are supposed to report the news, not comment on it.
Saying they are glad of anything is not reporting the news.
What else are they glad of, that they didn’t have a knife? That they didn’t have a brick to smash someone’s head in? That no one suddenly had a massive coronary?
This is obviously anti-gun bias sneaking its way in.
It’s propaganda, plain and simple.
Everyone should be flooding the stations with complaints and calling it what it is: propaganda and telling the stations as soon as we hang up with them, we are calling their advertisers.
"Are you glad they didn't have gunz?"
Sickening.
.
(eg: picture of the Jonestown carnage with "Glad they didn't have a gun!" caption)
Mr. niteowl77
It’s a good thing the teachers at Sandy Hook Elementary didn’t have guns?
Reminds me of an old 1970s or early 1980s TV cop show.
Robbers take hostages inside a bank, including a cop. Cop is disarmed by the robbers.
One citizen shows the cop he still has a handgun in an ankle holster. NOW GET THIS! Cop seizes the handgun, and throws it out through the window, leaving all unarmed.
At that moment I tried not to throw a shoe through the TV.
I never saw a “privately owned handgun” used for good in any TV shows in the 1970s or 1980s.
Psyops for government mouther’s marxist-speak. Coming up (amplified) at 11:00.
Would it make you feel any better, little girl, if they was pushed out of windows? .-—Archie Bunker
Ping to an observation about how to gain public support to ban guns.
Okay: Glad they didn't have a gun"!