Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘War and Peace’: Incest and Fruit-Smashing Sex with Style to Spare
Daily Beast ^ | January 19, 2016 | Tom Sykes

Posted on 01/19/2016 7:28:40 AM PST by C19fan

The opening scene of War and Peace, the first two hours of which screened on A&E, Lifetime, and History Channel on Monday night, was specifically constructed with the purpose of allaying fears that the screen version would not be faithful to Leo Tolstoy’s 1800-page magnum opus.

(Excerpt) Read more at thedailybeast.com ...


TOPICS: Books/Literature; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: bbc; movies; period; tolstoy; tvprograms; tvseries; warandpeace
I am enjoying the Yank Paul Dano as Pierre. Is Pierre the first nerd in cultural history?
1 posted on 01/19/2016 7:28:40 AM PST by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: C19fan

If the series is faithful to the book it will be a great cure for insomnia.


2 posted on 01/19/2016 7:42:07 AM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
...faithful to Leo Tolstoy's 1800-page magnum opus...

I read the Classic Comic book version. Does that count?

3 posted on 01/19/2016 7:48:30 AM PST by El Cid (Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
War...

and Peace?!
How did they do that?
4 posted on 01/19/2016 7:50:55 AM PST by The Louiswu (what is art?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

Actually it isn’t bad or boring at all in Russian - its just the horrible Constance Garnet English translation. Same for any piece of Russian literature she got her mitts on.


5 posted on 01/19/2016 8:02:10 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
Frankly, I have never found it difficult to follow the patronymics, nicknames, and given names in Russian literature, and it's hard to imagine that any intelligent person would.

However, I do not like it when someone takes it upon himself to "improve" on a great work of literature.

Davis is quite right when he argues that the incestuous affair—which is presented as rumor in the book—needs to be shown explicitly in a modern screen adaptation of the novel.

I haven't seen the production, but I doubt it.

Tolstoy described Helene perfectly. She is the quintessence of a beautiful sociopath (of whom I have had my fill in my own personal life), and Tolstoy's description does not need to be any more explicit.

6 posted on 01/19/2016 8:04:52 AM PST by Savage Beast (If Yamamoto could have foreseen the sleeping giant that Trump would awakened!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

You know, Tolstoy originally wanted to name the book “War, What Is It Good For”.


7 posted on 01/19/2016 8:16:18 AM PST by SunTzuWu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunTzuWu; All
You know, Tolstoy originally wanted to name the book “War, What Is It Good For”.

Ok Elaine
8 posted on 01/19/2016 9:25:00 AM PST by notdownwidems (Washington DC has become the enemy of free people everywhere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

**** “If the series is faithful to the book it will be a great cure for insomnia” ****

Hope in this telling there is a least a Moose and Squirrel


9 posted on 01/19/2016 9:55:21 AM PST by TexasTransplant (Idiocracy used to just be a Movie... Live every day as your last...one day you will be right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Gillian Anderon in costume for War and Peace

10 posted on 01/19/2016 10:02:48 AM PST by JoeProBono (SOME IMAGES MAY BE DISTURBING ’VIEWER DISCRETION IS ADVISED;-{)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PIF
Actually it isn't bad or boring at all in Russian - its just the horrible Constance Garnet English translation. Same for any piece of Russian literature she got her mitts on.

I read the Pevear/Volokhonsky version a year or two ago. Loved it. First time I'd read an unabridged version. The only time I found it dull was when Tolstoy departed from the story to expound his theory of history. I loved the detailed inner lives of all the characters.

I DVR'd episode one of this new version but have not watched it yet. I was a little disappointed that Pierre does not appear to be as overweight as he was described in the novel.

The only film I have really liked of War and Peace is the Russian one. Everything in that film was from the novel and nothing was added. It is also one of the most jaw-droppingly spectacular films ever made. Unfortunately, all films of War and Peace cut most of Maria Bolkonsky's story.

11 posted on 01/19/2016 10:38:59 AM PST by Sans-Culotte (''Political correctness is communist propaganda writ small''~ Theodore Dalrymple)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

Which translation did you read? It’s the all time greatest work of fiction imo.


12 posted on 04/22/2022 7:42:36 AM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson