Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Planet Nine's profile fleshed out
BBC ^ | 4/8/2916 | Paul Rincon

Posted on 04/09/2016 7:29:13 PM PDT by JimSEA

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: MtnClimber

I agree. I got lost in calculus. There is no way I could understand how to calculate the elliptical orbit of anything.

I just think it’s fascinating that very small changes in the track of tiny space vehicles could be measured in a way that tells “something” is out there.

We will be old and gray by the time they figure this out. (Old and gray is not a huge leap for me.)


41 posted on 04/10/2016 9:59:30 AM PDT by Vermont Lt (Ask Bernie supporters two questions: Who is rich. Who decides. In the past, that meant who died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA; KevinDavis; annie laurie; Knitting A Conundrum; Viking2002; Ernest_at_the_Beach; ...
Thanks JimSEA.
 
X-Planets
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · subscribe ·
Google news searches: exoplanet · exosolar · extrasolar ·
Konstantin Batygin keyword, sorted newest to oldest:
42 posted on 04/10/2016 12:07:31 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 75thOVI; Abathar; agrace; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aragorn; aristotleman; ...
John Matese keyword:
43 posted on 04/10/2016 7:07:16 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

New to me (or maybe it fell out with some of the other marbles):

Hills cloud
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hills_cloud


44 posted on 04/11/2016 5:33:39 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


sorted newest to oldest:
45 posted on 04/11/2016 5:34:08 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Yeah but...what does Gil Broussard say?


46 posted on 04/11/2016 5:59:28 AM PDT by pgkdan (The Silent Majority Stands With TRUMP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Any news yet on real estate prices on Planet X yet?


47 posted on 04/11/2016 11:19:34 AM PDT by Grimmy (equivocation is but the first step along the road to capitulation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: yarddog

What constitutes a planet?

I would have thought that anything with enough gravity to pull itself into a spherical shape AND have a regular orbit would qualify?

and I am iffy on the regular orbit too... would a long elliptical orbit qualify?


48 posted on 04/11/2016 12:07:21 PM PDT by Mr. K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

not just science, but SETTLED science


49 posted on 04/11/2016 12:07:56 PM PDT by Mr. K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Terabitten

Yup, we need big $$$$ to fund a space craft to intercept this planet!


50 posted on 04/11/2016 12:09:17 PM PDT by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$; Mr. K

One thing which irritates the dickens out of me is when scientists discuss what to do with an asteroid heading towards Earth, they always immediately dismiss the idea of an atomic bomb, saying it would just make it worse.

It seems obvious to me that an atomic blast would blow it to millions of pieces. Some (most?) would take off in different directions eliminating those parts from the trajectory. Also the tiny bits remaining would have thousands of times the surface area as the original meteor. That would cause them to burn up in the atmosphere, leaving a tiny remnant that would get through.

Why do they dismiss such an obvious solution, making clearly wrong observations?


51 posted on 04/11/2016 12:30:35 PM PDT by yarddog (Romans 8:38-39, For I am persuaded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: yarddog

Probably more of a fear of nukes than anything else.


52 posted on 04/11/2016 12:32:41 PM PDT by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$

I think that is basically what it is.

The scientists are typically anti-nuke and they are not going to admit anything positive about them.


53 posted on 04/11/2016 12:41:08 PM PDT by yarddog (Romans 8:38-39, For I am persuaded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson