Fox News is reporting SCOTUS split on immigration, Roberts says he may approve!!

FOX NEWS CABLE ^ | Fox News NO LINK

[rodguy911]

Good luck with that.

I've been printing this same story for a few years now with little or no traction.

strangely enough however no one has ever challenged my story.

The NYT does an introductory interview with every new scotus and when J.Roberts was picked by GW they did the customary background report they would do with any justice. Im pretty sure This is where they found the discrepancies with the adoption of his kids.

They reported about half the story and when it got to how he adopted the kids they claimed they couldn't go any further since "they didn't want to violate the civil rights of the kids."

Yeah right.

Since when is the NYT afraid of violating the rights of a supposed conservative judges kids.Hard to tell what went on there.

[Art in Idaho]

As an aside Scalia met with obama on Scalia's plane the day before he died.I think he was assassinated. There you have it.

Whoa! Anyone have more details on this? Insider information? Do we have it documented Scalia met with Obama on his plane? Big news if true. Even just the scheduling information would be Big news, . . no proof, but if he was on the plane. .

[rodguy911]

http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index2001.htm

This should tell you just about everything you want to know
how the f86’s I believe jets followed them as they chatted in scalia’s plane and zero wound up in LA at a fund rasier or something.

[rodguy911]

http://beforeitsnews.com/politics/2016/02/shocking-scalia-had-secret-texas-meeting-with-obama-just-hours-before-his-death-2779892.html

heres more

[stephenjohnbanker]

“But, as a jurist, Judge Roberts’s approach will be that of his entire career: carefully, faithfully applying the Constitution and legal precedent.”

Well Mr.Cruz, your pal Roberts certainly shot that one all to hell!

[danamco]

I’m sure John Roberts is well aware of Andrew Breitbart, Michael Hastings’ “car accident,” Bill Gwatney in exchange for Chelsea Hubbell and lately fellow justice Scalia, and the treatment Donald Trump is getting. WAKE up folks, HELLO. It’s TIME !!!

[JudyinCanada]

Obama will likely have some way to have the illegals voting by November. He’s that evil.

[Sacajaweau]

No such opinion has come out. Someone was merely speculating.

[LucyT]

Isn’t it Roberts kids who were illegally adopted? How old are they now? Apparently he has no problem selling us out as long as it doesn’t affect him.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Since you asked,I have been saying we have a stealth 5/3 court all along and we do.

Here is what happened.

Years ago Roberts and his wife found two children in her home county of cork,Ireland.

Urged by Roberts' mother-in-law to adopt them,he took the kids and their birth mothers to Central America.

Once there they adopted the kids as if they were from Central America and brought them to the USA to live.

Everything seemed fine for years until obamacare came along.

Knowing that Roberts would savage obamacare the regime started looking into his past probably found the NTYT article that covered half of the story and the regime figured out the rest. Roberts had already written the against of obamacare for the court when he suddenly changed his mind and discovered that obamacare was indeed a tax.

Scalia tried for a month to talk him out of it but it didn't work.

So best guess is the regime got to Roberts and they own him from now on.

As an aside Scalia met with obama on Scalia's plane the day before he died. I think he was assassinated. There you have it.

The prostitute was supposedly hired by the Sea Aye Hay and then killed after she shot him up. (drugs) Supposedly there is video from the ranch/resort. Also resort owner is a big dem bundler.

[azishot]

I am sickened to a degree I’ve never experienced before. Will our country ever recover? For the sake of my grandchildren I pray it will.

[rodguy911]

About all we can do is what we do best here. Keep exposing them for who they are and what they do.

I'm convinced if they know we are aware of what they are up to they will cave. That's been their mo so far. We just need to keep it up.

[stockpirate]

If it were time, you wouldn’t need to tell em, they’d know. It’s interesting how it works. One day people are wayching TV, the next day hundreds of thousands of people in the streets stopping the government from operating.

[rodguy911]

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/04/18/supreme-court-takes-up-battle-over-obama-immigration-actions.html

The chief justice — who years ago helped preserve ObamaCare — later said “crossing out” the “lawfully present” phrase might keep the executive action intact, a suggestion the Justice Department lawyer eagerly embraced, saying it would be “totally fine.”

Roberts is pulling the same crap he pulled during obamacare. He just looks for something lawyerly that can defeat the will of conservatives while keeping him out of jail or his kids being sent back to Ireland. Meanwhile citizens take another obama dictatorial hit.

[Salvation]

Roberts is being blackmailed by Obama.

[zeugma]

Oral arguments 15-674. United States v. Texas (PDF)

[Art in Idaho]

Thank you for the link and information. Amazing.

[rodguy911]

No problem my pleasure. I just wish more people would take an interest in this and the death of Scalia. Both are huge events IMHO.I have put in countless hours on the adoption scandal.Several pages have gone dark since I started as well.

[rodguy911]

http://www.mrconservative.com/2013/05/16722-was-chief-justice-roberts-blackmailed-into-supporting-obamacare-maybe/

Here is another one i just found.

In 2012, Chief Justice John Roberts cast the deciding vote for the Supreme Court’s ruling that ObamaCare was a legal tax.

Conservatives were beyond stunned. Roberts’ decision was a narrow, weaving, legal mess, unlike the clear, assured opinions he usually wrote. What the heck happened? Some people posited that he had brain damage from a fall he’d taken some years before.

Others sourly said that he’d fallen prey to what’s called Greenhouse Syndrome – the Supreme Court justices’ desperate need to feel the love from The New York Times’ former Supreme Court reporter, Linda Greenhouse.

There were also some subterranean murmurings that the Obama administration was blackmailing Chief Justice Roberts. This was a bit far-fetched. We all knew that Obama habitually practiced a Chicago-approach to politics, one that saw him digging up secret dirt on his opponents, releasing it, and forcing them out of the election.

For example, when Obama ran for the U.S. Senate in 2004, his opponent was the popular Jack Ryan. As the campaign progressed badly for Obama, secret court filings from Ryan’s divorce “miraculously” appeared with unproven allegations from his former wife about his sexual practices. The scandal hit the fan, Ryan dropped out of the race, and Obama ran essentially unopposed against Ryan’s replacement, Alan Keyes.

But what in the world could Obama have on Chief Justice Roberts? The man is pure as driven snow, for goodness sakes. He has a lovely wife, two picture-perfect little blond children, and universal adulation from anyone who had ever associated with him, either personally or professionally.

Was Chief Justice Roberts Blackmailed Into Supporting Obamacare? Maybe.

In 2012, Chief Justice John Roberts cast the deciding vote for the Supreme Court’s ruling that ObamaCare was a legal tax. Conservatives were beyond stunned. Roberts’ decision was a narrow, weaving, legal mess, unlike the clear, assured opinions he usually wrote.

What the heck happened? Some people posited that he had brain damage from a fall he’d taken some years before. Others sourly said that he’d fallen prey to what’s called Greenhouse Syndrome – the Supreme Court justices’ desperate need to feel the love from The New York Times’ former Supreme Court reporter, Linda Greenhouse.

There were also some subterranean murmurings that the Obama administration was blackmailing Chief Justice Roberts. This was a bit far-fetched. (Read More: Obama Dodges Responsibility For IRS, AP, & Benghazi: Blames Everyone Except Himself.) But about those picture-perfect little blond children. . . . Jake Baker, writing at a blog called No Compromise offers an interesting new theory: he thinks that the Obama administration may have threatened to take Roberts’ children away from him. You see, they’re not his biological children. Instead, the Chief Justice and his wife adopted them in 2000. Roberts has never talked about the circumstances of their adoption, which is perfectly understandable, given the privacy such a personal transaction deserves. To the extent it’s mentioned, they’ve been said to have been adopted from a Latin American country – something inconsistent with their Nordic coloring.

Baker now posits that it’s entirely possible that the Obama administration finished what The New York Times started in 2005, when Roberts was nominated to the Supreme Court –unsealing the private adoption papers for Roberts’ children. The only information currently known about the adoption, says Baker, is that it was a private adoption, meaning that it was done without an agency. Instead, the birth parents and the adoptive parents arrange it on their own. Despite the vague reference to Latin America, given the children’s Nordic appearance, it’s entirely possible, Baker argues, that they came from Ireland.

[Vaduz]

what is serving as the proof here?

They tend to change law rather then obey it case in point emanate domain law they changed.
They then to think they are congress they get sloppy with their reasoning because most of them have an agenda.

[rdcbn]

If Judge Roberts wanted to throw the Amnesty decision all he had to do was cast the deciding vote