Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The 21st Century’s 100 greatest films
BBC Culture ^ | August 23, 2016

Posted on 08/23/2016 9:58:21 AM PDT by EveningStar

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last
To: katana

true. But at least they played straight characters. Now the movies all 100% propaganda for gays.


41 posted on 08/23/2016 10:46:09 AM PDT by dp0622 (The only thing an upper crust conservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Oh? Really?

We are less than 17 years into the 21st Century and someone has come up with the greatest films for the entire one hundred years?

Well then, close down the visual entertainment system world wide! After all its “settled” and nothing can change it, ever. It has been nice knowing you Hollywood, Pinewood, Bollywood, and all the rest.


42 posted on 08/23/2016 10:47:35 AM PDT by Nip (BOHEICA and TANSTAAFL - both seem very appropriate today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

“we asked critics to name the greatest American films of all time, and we were surprised that only six films made since 2000 made the top 100.”

Well, “of all time” covers an outer limit of 120 years, starting with Edison inventing the first movie projector. That leaves us with the 21st Century covering about 13% of all movies. Of that, 6% of movies make the “21st Century movies making the all-time-best” list - not an unreasonable conclusion, considering that a large chunk of “best” take a long time to rise to the surface, considered “meh” at the time but eventually deemed “great”. There’s also the mass of late-20th Century nominees which _won’t_ stand the test of time, falling from “wow, that was amazing when I saw it in my teens!” to “wow, that list-maker had lousy taste when he was a kid”.

6% isn’t bad at this point.
Give it time.
Surely “John Carter” will top the list eventually.


43 posted on 08/23/2016 10:47:43 AM PDT by ctdonath2 ("If anyone will not listen to your words, shake the dust from your feet and leave them." - Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

What a load!

21st century filmmaking has excelled only in combining CGI and action in films. So far anyway.


44 posted on 08/23/2016 10:51:11 AM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
Seen: 96. Finding Nemo (Andrew Stanton, 2003) 93. Ratatouille (Brad Bird, 2007) 87. Amélie (Jean-Pierre Jeunet, 2001) 83. A.I. Artificial Intelligence (Steven Spielberg, 2001) 62. Inglourious Basterds (Quentin Tarantino, 2009) 59. A History of Violence (David Cronenberg, 2005) 51. Inception (Christopher Nolan, 2010) 50. The Assassin (Hou Hsiao-hsien, 2015) 41. Inside Out (Pete Docter, 2015) 35. Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon (Ang Lee, 2000) 33. The Dark Knight (Christopher Nolan, 2008) 29. WALL-E (Andrew Stanton, 2008) 27. The Social Network (David Fincher, 2010) 25. ​Memento (Christopher Nolan, 2000) 17. Pan's Labyrinth (Guillermo Del Toro, 2006) 13. Children of Men (Alfonso Cuarón, 2006) 4. Spirited Away (Hayao Miyazaki, 2001) Am surprised how many Pixar movies made the list.
45 posted on 08/23/2016 10:51:26 AM PDT by ctdonath2 ("If anyone will not listen to your words, shake the dust from your feet and leave them." - Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Even though I have seen about half of this list, I can safely say that none of these films would make my list of the 100 greatest films ever made.


46 posted on 08/23/2016 10:53:06 AM PDT by yuleeyahoo (Those are my principles, and if you do not like them...well I have others. - Groucho Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
Just counting films with Viggo Mortensen, two they missed are Eastern Promises and The Road. The latter is too dark for most people but an excellent film nonetheless. And how did they miss the LOTR trilogy of 2001, 2002, and 2003? I wasn't much of a Mortensen fan until I started adding up all the really good films he'd been in.
47 posted on 08/23/2016 10:54:24 AM PDT by katana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: qam1

If you thought the Scientology version of War of the Worlds was great the first time through, remind me to not look to you for movie reviews.


48 posted on 08/23/2016 11:00:38 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Oh if only Sharknado was made a few years earlier...


49 posted on 08/23/2016 11:00:48 AM PDT by Organic Panic (Hillary Clinton, the elderly woman's version of "I dindu nuffins.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mears
Would you believe I watched that scene you described last night? It was masterful. Both were superb in the scene. I may have to make sure I have a quarter in my pocket from now on. I saw the movie in the theater and have not watched it again until last night. I did not remember that scene at all, but the movie I never forgot. One of the all time best. Javier won the Oscar for best actor and, of course, the movie won Best Picture.

The suspense is unbelievable. Everything is well done. I even liked Tommy Lee Jones and he is not one of my favorites.

50 posted on 08/23/2016 11:04:03 AM PDT by Dave W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

The list is worthless opinion pap. Mad max, fury road was terrible and yet it’s way up the list.


51 posted on 08/23/2016 11:19:19 AM PDT by Mr. Douglas (Today is your life. What are you going to do with it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mykroar

I saw Under the skin and you are absolutely correct. It is a B film at best. It belongs on a 100 worst list, not best.


52 posted on 08/23/2016 11:23:12 AM PDT by Mr. Douglas (Today is your life. What are you going to do with it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Mears

Yeah. Pretty much anything from the Cohen brothers belongs on the list.


53 posted on 08/23/2016 11:23:48 AM PDT by Mr. Douglas (Today is your life. What are you going to do with it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Scythian_Reborn

I commend you for not listing any of the “Godfather” movies. The first one was good, not great, the rest were boring.


54 posted on 08/23/2016 11:23:48 AM PDT by raybbr (That progressive bumper sticker on your car might just as well say, "Yes, I'm THAT stupid!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: pajama pundit

That’s the one that caused me to toss the whole list as well. I liked the MM movies but that one was just awful.


55 posted on 08/23/2016 11:24:31 AM PDT by Mr. Douglas (Today is your life. What are you going to do with it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

bump


56 posted on 08/23/2016 11:30:21 AM PDT by Albion Wilde ("They only smear who they fear." --Diamond and Silk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
Any list for "greatest 21st century" movies that doesn't include the Lord of the Rings series, specifically The Fellowship of the Ring, is a pointless list.

It appears this list focuses more on social justice warrioring, though.
57 posted on 08/23/2016 11:31:11 AM PDT by randomhero97 ("First you want to kill me, now you want to kiss me. Blow!" - Ash)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

I never saw any of them, never like mob movies ...


58 posted on 08/23/2016 11:34:36 AM PDT by Scythian_Reborn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Bringbackthedraft

1939, absolutely.

WWII prematurely ended the Golden Age of Hollywood: Male stars enlisted, and movies became propaganda.

I am not denouncing patriotic, war-time movie making as have my leftist associates of the past (deriding them as jingoistic); I am merely acknowledging that vigorously advancing the artistic state of the still-new art had abruptly ceased to be the focus after 1940.

Some of those movies were still quite good; they just weren’t as consistently or dramatically ground breaking as in 1939 (or, to a lesser extent, 1940).


59 posted on 08/23/2016 12:30:21 PM PDT by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - JRRT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

A bit early for this, isn’t it?


60 posted on 08/23/2016 12:33:00 PM PDT by ExGeeEye (For dark is the suede that mows like a harvest.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson