To: Borges; DollyCali; Perdogg
To: EveningStar
Jerry: Let me ask you a question. If you named a kid Rasputin do you think that would have a negative effect on his life?
Elaine: Nah.
3 posted on
08/27/2016 2:48:45 PM PDT by
Hildy
To: EveningStar
No animals were harmed in the creation of this film
... well except for the thousands chopped into their tasty bits for the crew lunch. But those were flyover state farm animals and not important Hollywood acting animals. Some of the flyover state animals were even fed to the Hollywood animals.
4 posted on
08/27/2016 2:50:01 PM PDT by
KarlInOhio
(Shut up, Bob Costas. Shut up! Shut up! Shut up! Shut up! Shut up! Shut up!)
To: EveningStar
The movie “Fargo” started out stating that it was a true story.
I will admit that thinking it was true made it funnier but I still don’t like to be lied to.
5 posted on
08/27/2016 2:56:48 PM PDT by
yarddog
(Romans 8:38-39, For I am persuaded.)
To: EveningStar
NOT FARGO! In fact, just the opposite. The stories are made-up but are claimed to be true!
Because...Coen Brothers.
7 posted on
08/27/2016 3:03:52 PM PDT by
bigbob
(The Hillary indictment will have to come from us.)
To: EveningStar
So Mel Brooks movies are sometimes true?
10 posted on
08/27/2016 3:07:00 PM PDT by
Dr. Sivana
("I'm a Contra."--President Ronald Reagan)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson