Posted on 10/18/2016 7:14:26 AM PDT by castlegreyskull
I suspect Hillary the Thief said almost the same thing, almost: "Isn't this grand?"
Stop being so naïve. If the judicial and law enforcement bureaucracy didn’t hold her accountable for the treason she’s committed by selling our secrets to the highest bidder, what makes you think the same bureaucrats will hold her accountable for stealing furniture from the State Department. She did the same thing when her and Bill left the White House and they were not held accountable for their theft then either. Stop being naïve. The entire system is rigged for the elites, they can basically do anything they want and the progressives that run and man the various governmental bureaucracies will protect them. Why do you think the progressives don’t really try to hide their criminal behaviors anymore? Because they have no real fear of being held accountable by the enforcers of law. This is not rocket science to understand what has happened to the country, over the last 20 or so years we’ve been slowly turned into a one party dictatorship like California. We are now a Banana Republic.
Clintons are above the law.
No reasonable prosecutor would prosecute them because they want to keep breathing.
Why get concerned over a few hundred thousand dollars? Hillary lost BILLIONS of dollars as SOS.
for that matter Mr. Trump has mentioned jailing the D candidate; but no mention of bringing the obama syndicate to justice, although others have touched on this!
???
G @ Planet WTF!
*****
I didn’t mean to sound naive. This is a symptom of a huge problem. But this case, it is a very basic crime. There is no need to follow money transfers or emails.
This crime is as basic as it gets, so that average American can easily follow the details. No need for tech experts and so on. The “I do not recall” defense cannot work. Killing witnesses wouldn’t protect her from being prosecuted.
So let us say she didn’t personally steal it, one of her assistants did. But now that she knowingly has stolen property in her home, that is a crime if she refuses to return it to the owner.
A Soldier is living in the barracks on an Army post.
He buys a small house off post.
He moves from the barracks and takes the furniture in his barracks room with him to his new house.
What will happen to this Soldier?
If she can take stuff, then so can I. Do they have any cream colored chairs or nice coffee tables?
Why Doesn’t Hillary Get Arrested For Stealing State Department Furniture?
_______________________________—
I think people should start asking her and her “stand-ins,” where’s the furniture she stole from her old State Dept office.
The details of her losing billions would bore most americans, so they won’t even give an effort to read an article that is more than a few sentences long. The same with all of the other crimes.
However, as far as crimes go, it is very basic. She stole something, the evidence is in her own home. This should outrage 100% of the entire American population, but it doesn’t upset hardly anyone.
Yep, McCain would tell us we have nothing to fear in a Hillary presidency.
The furniture she stole probably wouldn’t fit into my home decor which largely includes “hand me down” furniture. But I could at least pawn the furniture and get a bottle of wild turkey with the money. .
He would remind everyone that she is a good and decent person. Then give an endorsement like he did for obama.
Hillary just bought the house next door to her Chappaqua residence, so expect more gov’t owned furniture to go amiss. If Hillary wants free furniture, the populace should help her get a free bunk bed, free blanket, free orange jumpsuit, and free meals, for life, at her nearest house of detainment!
What makes this very angering is that she has plenty of money to buy the finest furniture, but they choose to steal it instead.
Watch "Hillary Clinton: A Career Criminal" on YouTube
https://youtu.be/kypl1MYuKDY (19.46 min)
Watch "Hillary Clinton: A Career Criminal" on YouTube
https://youtu.be/kypl1MYuKDY (19.46 min)
Just asking that question shows a certain level of naiveté. But leaving that aside, the amount and quality of Prima Facia evidence of Hillary’s does not matter in America today. Reason being the bureaucrats that hold the levers of power, Obama, Comey, Lynch et al, have decided that she will not face justice under any circumstances. Until these people are removed from power and legitimate Americans that believe in law and order and the duty of their office of public trust to uphold the law as written, we are going to see much more of this lawlessness in DC and that in turn is going to lead to a lot more violence in the streets.
This is the kind of stuff that will resonate with the brain dead voter. They don’t get the Wikileaks emails or James O’Keefe’s footage but theft they probably get. It just adds to the perception that she’s a crook.
OOPS, it should say: “the amount and quality of Prima Facia evidence of Hillarys criminal activities and treason does not seem to matter in America today”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.