Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Lurkinanloomin
It does not matter where he was born. His father was a foreign national. That alone makes him not a natural born citizen.

Wrong yet again (still). Stop it with the extra made-up conditions for being a natural born citizen. Citizen at birth, that's all it means.

While there are numerous aspects to Obama's birth and status that make him undesirable, if he was actually born in HI he is a natural-born citizen per the Founders' chosen definition. If he was born in Kenya, he is not. That's the bottom line. Your made up garbage makes you, and by extension, the rest of us, look like kooks.

51 posted on 05/28/2017 8:20:16 PM PDT by calenel (The Democratic Party is a Criminal Enterprise. It is the Socialist Mafia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: calenel
If he was born in Kenya, he is not. I believe that is not entirely accurate. Obama's mother was a US citizen. If she chose to register his birth with the US Embassy while living abroad, I believe Obama would be considered a US citizen. As the registration of his birth was never brought up, I suspect she did not do it.
52 posted on 05/28/2017 8:28:38 PM PDT by MrsEmmaPeel (a government big enough to give you everything you want, is big enough to take everything you have)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Thanks Republicans and most conservative commentators who wouldn’t touch this issue, yet the entire media is talking about Trump and Russia non-stop. Trump was great on this in 2011.


53 posted on 05/28/2017 8:29:11 PM PDT by TakebackGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: calenel
If he was born in Kenya, he is not.

But he was, so it doesn't matter does it? That's the bottom line.


60 posted on 05/28/2017 9:26:16 PM PDT by Brown Deer (America First!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: calenel; Lurkinanloomin
I am not going to get into this to the extent that I have many times in the past but he never was nor is a US Citizen.
73 posted on 05/29/2017 4:42:07 AM PDT by GregNH (If you can't fight, please find a good place to hide!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: calenel

” Stop it with the extra made-up conditions for being a natural born citizen. Citizen at birth, that’s all it means.”

You are WRONG! I realize this a complicated issue for many. Having studied this thoroughly for years, I can tell you that the framers and founders knew exactly what they were doing and exactly what a “natural born citizen was and meant. There is just NO QUESTION about this.

The fact that you can’t accept it doesn’t change the truth.

Born in the country to TWO citizen parents. PERIOD!

Obama qualifies on NEITHER!


77 posted on 05/29/2017 5:07:48 AM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: calenel
Stop it with the extra made-up conditions for being a natural born citizen. Citizen at birth, that's all it means

So perhaps you could explain the inclusion of this "extra" text in the Constitution?

No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President
ML/NJ
85 posted on 05/29/2017 8:00:05 AM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: calenel
Wrong yet again (still). Stop it with the extra made-up conditions for being a natural born citizen. Citizen at birth, that's all it means.

This is incorrect.

While there are numerous aspects to Obama's birth and status that make him undesirable, if he was actually born in HI he is a natural-born citizen per the Founders' chosen definition.

This is incorrect. Citizenship derived form the 14th amendment is not "natural" citizenship. Natural citizens had no need of the 14th amendment to be citizens.

99 posted on 05/29/2017 1:13:23 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: calenel

You are the one who’s wrong.


102 posted on 05/29/2017 1:57:53 PM PDT by MileHi (Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: calenel

The original kid died and the CIA substituted the Djakarta street kid.

.


104 posted on 05/29/2017 6:20:15 PM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: calenel
Wrong yet again (still). Stop it with the extra made-up conditions for being a natural born citizen. Citizen at birth, that's all it means.

While there are numerous aspects to Obama's birth and status that make him undesirable, if he was actually born in HI he is a natural-born citizen per the Founders' chosen definition. If he was born in Kenya, he is not. That's the bottom line. Your made up garbage makes you, and by extension, the rest of us, look like kooks.


The Supreme Court has addressed the subject, and clearly stated that the term 'natural born Citizen', means a person born in a country of parents who are it's citizens.
The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these doubts. It is sufficient for everything we have now to consider that all children born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction are themselves citizens.
The founders heavily relied on Vattel, and his The Law of Nations when forming the Country. It's even ironic, that a few years back, when there was much ballyhoo over the library book that was never returned by George Washington, was a copy of The Law of Nations.

This is what The Law of Nations has to say about the term 'natural born Citizen'
The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.


The word 'natural', in 'natural born Citizen', is a reference to natural law and in such context means - someone a Citizen at birth via natural law. Natural law is underlying law that exists without positive (man made) law. So, a natural born Citizen requires no positive law in order to be a Citizen.

So, it's clear that 'natural born Citizen', and 'Citizen at birth', are not equatable, because positive law can be written to grant Citizenship where natural law does not.
109 posted on 05/30/2017 1:36:32 PM PDT by MMaschin (The difference between strategy and tactics!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: calenel
Wrong yet again (still). Stop it with the extra made-up conditions for being a natural born citizen. Citizen at birth, that's all it means.

While there are numerous aspects to Obama's birth and status that make him undesirable, if he was actually born in HI he is a natural-born citizen per the Founders' chosen definition. If he was born in Kenya, he is not. That's the bottom line. Your made up garbage makes you, and by extension, the rest of us, look like kooks.


The Supreme Court has addressed the subject, and clearly stated that the term 'natural born Citizen', means a person born in a country of parents who are it's citizens.
The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these doubts. It is sufficient for everything we have now to consider that all children born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction are themselves citizens.
The founders heavily relied on Vattel, and his The Law of Nations when forming the Country. It's even ironic, that a few years back, when there was much ballyhoo over the library book that was never returned by George Washington, was a copy of The Law of Nations.

This is what The Law of Nations has to say about the term 'natural born Citizen'
The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.


The word 'natural', in 'natural born Citizen', is a reference to natural law and in such context means - someone a Citizen at birth via natural law. Natural law is underlying law that exists without positive (man made) law. So, a natural born Citizen requires no positive law in order to be a Citizen.

So, it's clear that 'natural born Citizen', and 'Citizen at birth', are not equatable, because positive law can be written to grant Citizenship where natural law does not.
110 posted on 05/30/2017 1:43:18 PM PDT by MMaschin (The difference between strategy and tactics!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson