Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

what is up with firefox 56.0 memory consumption?
me | 2017/10/8 | me

Posted on 10/08/2017 8:50:21 PM PDT by SteveH

what is up with firefox 56.0 memory consumption?

i am seeing memory leak symptoms that manifest fairly quickly (an hour or two of my normal usage).

add ons

openh264 video codec cisco 1.6 widevine content google 1.4.8.1008 shockwave flash adobe 27


TOPICS: Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: firefox; memoryleak
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: Perseverando

Does Brave have something equivalent to the NoScript addon for Firefox? I loathe letting any site execute javascript without my permission.


21 posted on 10/08/2017 10:03:35 PM PDT by CatOwner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Pollard

I tried Palemoon, Cyberfox and Comodo Ice Dragon. They are all based on the Mozilla/Firefox code.

I found that many of my extensions would not work the 64-bit versions of those programs. Many of the extensions worked very well with the 32-bit versions, as Firefox is(was) a 32-bit program.

However, over the years those programs have become too problematic. It is frustrating to have programmers change programs just for the sake of changing them. I have given up many programs, utilities, extensions over the years because programmers took out the features I used or made the programs no longer useful. Upgrades/updates seem to break more things than they fix.


22 posted on 10/08/2017 10:12:20 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Freedom56v2

I have noticed that when I don’t have flash, a number of video apps won’t work...Is there an alternative??

Sometimes, but it takes some effort. I'm a security freak so I disable both flash and javascript. To play embeded video I usually have to (right click) "view page source," then type ".mp4" --.mp4 being the most common video filetype.
If I find the url of the mp4 I just copy it and paste it into my video player application; I use VLC, its great and free. HTH


23 posted on 10/08/2017 10:34:00 PM PDT by 867V309 (Lock Her Up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Perseverando

Bkmkfl


24 posted on 10/08/2017 10:37:24 PM PDT by mabarker1 (Progress- the opposite of congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

roflmao


25 posted on 10/08/2017 11:02:21 PM PDT by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TBP

i have the flash addon as “always ask.”

apparently that is not enough...


26 posted on 10/08/2017 11:04:14 PM PDT by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: foundedonpurpose

wow, political correctness may adversely affect content delivery AND product quality...

in the old days, there was only memory leak, or no memory leak...

we live in interesting times... sigh...


27 posted on 10/08/2017 11:08:24 PM PDT by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 867V309

Wow, well thank you for the tips!

So it is the flash that is making the FireFox bleed memory? Interesting—it did not used to be so bad, but now I have to close it and reopen it every couple hours.

I use snag-it to record stuff—mostly GoToMeeting webinars, and they are all mp4 files.

I also watch a lot of YouTube—which I hope are mp4.

the rest of the videos on news sites, etc. I don’t mind skipping.


28 posted on 10/08/2017 11:09:20 PM PDT by Freedom56v2 (Freeper formerly known as bushwon ;))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

Bkmk


29 posted on 10/09/2017 12:54:29 AM PDT by Mr Radical (In times of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SteveH

ping


30 posted on 10/09/2017 1:45:41 AM PDT by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. Mr Trump, we've got your six.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SteveH

I turned off flash totally and now i am now still creeping up to 847 Mb (on a PC) after watching a few youtube videos. I wonder if casting of aspersions of memory abusage by add-ons is entirely justified.

I am reading about rust, but if they have extensively used it, then it does not seem to be doing them any good.

Personally (trying to phrase this diplomatically) I think that ansi C works very well if not near optimally well for complex programs— eg, kernels and RDBMSs.


31 posted on 10/09/2017 2:04:25 AM PDT by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perseverando

It does not run very well on iOS.

Crashes frequently

But I do like it on my Windows 7 machine.


32 posted on 10/09/2017 3:30:52 AM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.L)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SteveH
Pale Moon browser
33 posted on 10/09/2017 3:40:15 AM PDT by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SteveH

It’s always been a pig. 57 may fix that. Supposedly it is adopting a new thread model more like Chrome.


34 posted on 10/09/2017 3:57:00 AM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac

RE: It does not run very well on iOS.

Crashes frequently

But I do like it on my Windows 7 machine.


I use it all the time on my iphone without any problems.

Don’t use it much at all on Windows 7 because it doesn’t work with my Scottrade streaming quotes.


35 posted on 10/09/2017 7:02:26 AM PDT by Perseverando (For Progressives, Islamonazis & other Totalitarians: It's all about PEOPLE CONTROL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SteveH

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=KPgyTzqDJhM

Don’t use Mozilla


36 posted on 10/09/2017 9:49:46 PM PDT by BookmanTheJanitor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomkat

It has similar source code to Firefox and the same memory issues.


37 posted on 10/16/2017 4:20:25 PM PDT by Professional Engineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: SteveH
They're getting ready to release some major big change, with FF 57 (coming in November, I think). I wouldn't be surprised if they're making 56 so unusable that people will do anything, including going to FF 57, to try to improve performance.

Oh, and part of this coercion? They're stopping the usability of any add-on that they deem "Legacy" -- that is, not ready for FF 57. There was a workaround to keep those add-ons working, but as of a few days ago, the workaround didn't work any more.

I'm using Brave for now (which I have a separate list of issues about), so I hope these authors update their add-ons soon...

38 posted on 10/21/2017 5:15:28 PM PDT by NewJerseyJoe (Rat mantra: "Facts are meaningless! You can use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CatOwner
That's of great concern to me, and one of the biggest reasons I used Firefox, despite its flaws. The current NoScript add-on has been designated "Legacy" by Firefox -- and as of several days ago, would not work anymore with FF 56.

There was a workaround to use the Legacy add-ons, but that appears to have been "fixed" now.

39 posted on 10/21/2017 5:20:45 PM PDT by NewJerseyJoe (Rat mantra: "Facts are meaningless! You can use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson