Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Updating financial data on refugee contractors, big bucks for ‘humanitarian’ work!
Refugee Resettlement Watch ^ | 7/11/17 | Ann Corcoran

Posted on 10/23/2017 12:07:53 PM PDT by Baynative

"...adding insult to injury, they lobby, kiss up to the media, and community organize against you who are paying for the whole refugee racket!

None of these organizations would survive very long if Congress and the President cut them loose"

(Excerpt) Read more at refugeeresettlementwatch.wordpress.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: corcoran; refugee; refugeeresettlement; resettlement; taxation
Shown here are the nine major federal resettlement contractors. (Go here to see a data base with the hundreds of subcontractors working for them in a town near you.)

For those who are interested in the ongoing process to flood the US with refugees, this short list of the agencies funded by our tax money will shock you. I did some quick math and almost ONE BILLION is shuttled to these activists from our government.

YOU ARE PAYING FOR THE REFUGEE INFLUX.

1 posted on 10/23/2017 12:07:53 PM PDT by Baynative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Baynative

Church World Service as of June 2016 had a total revenue for the previous year of $88,455,527.

71.3% of their millions comes from you—the taxpayer—according to Charity Navigator, here. You are the source of government grants:


These folks made nice jobs for themselves at our expense. The church part of the organization was just used to gain trust and fool people.


2 posted on 10/23/2017 12:13:39 PM PDT by boycott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

US Conference of Catholic Bishops - 97% funded by taxpayer “contributions,” ....


3 posted on 10/23/2017 12:25:04 PM PDT by Ken522
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

I remember when GW Bush spoke of how efficient church charities were, and having the government “partner” with them. I suppose that, in the fullness of time and Obama’s drive to infect our society with non-whites, is what GWB’s idea and initiative has turned into.


4 posted on 10/23/2017 12:50:41 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine (White is the new Black.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

On Bush’s watch, Katrina ‘refugees’ were often helped and placed by Baton Rouge area churches. The Demon Rats in congress had a cow and actually passed a law that no church helping Katrina ‘victims’ could receive any tax dollars (separation of church and state). I know this because my former church took in some of these homeless. No federal tax dollars was requested or received. I guess the government can only give tax dollars to ‘churches’ that ‘help’ non citizens.


5 posted on 10/23/2017 1:17:37 PM PDT by sportutegrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sportutegrl; boycott; Pearls Before Swine; Ken522

I am not an expert on all churches, but the ones i have encountered dealing with refugee resettlement are all way to left on the political scale and make no effort to hide it.


6 posted on 10/23/2017 1:33:44 PM PDT by Baynative ( Someone's going to have to pay for these carbon emissions, so it might as well be you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

My point is that if this is still the law of the land, (that tax dollars can’t go to religious organizations), then let’s claw back these funds.


7 posted on 10/23/2017 1:53:06 PM PDT by sportutegrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

A start at chipping away at this would have the law limit the grants to only “matching funds”.

As it is you can see why so meaning “churches” are all high on support for illegals and refugees - it’s big business and putting their folks into big salaried NGO/Non-profit jobs.

The entire NGO and global charity world is now no longer charity, it’s an industry with billions at stake ripping off taxpayers to feather that industry’s own nest.


8 posted on 10/23/2017 3:23:36 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wuli
RE:"A start at chipping away at this would have the law limit the grants to only “matching funds”."

Now there's a good idea!

9 posted on 10/23/2017 4:38:05 PM PDT by Baynative ( Someone's going to have to pay for these carbon emissions, so it might as well be you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson