Posted on 01/23/2018 4:38:56 AM PST by MNDude
how does someone research accuracy?
( Q caught my eye as reminds of Q of STNG)
Another reason the swampers were kept in government.
Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.
Q has predicted accurately president Trump would tweet probably a dozen times now already. Research it on your own. I used to make fun of those who followed him and then I researched the predictions and I I’m completely convinced now.
If this were another country, we would be speculating about the loyalty and whereabouts of all the major combat commanders.
They are not showing signs of folding.
Escalation is a real possibility.
I just can’t follow these Q posts.
It is like they are talking in Swahili or something. Or Joe Piscipo doing the sports news.
Here is what Q predicted about three days ago.
“Will SESSIONS drop the hammer?
1 of 22.
#Memo shifts narrative.
#Memo reinstates SESSIONS’ authority re: Russia/ALL.”
Did you read the news this morning? Sure, anyone can get lucky getting a prediction right, but he predicts accurately again and again and again. He is legit.
I've been saying all along that they'd physically assassinated Trump if they couldn't assassinate him politically.
If you look closely, almost all of Trump's inner circle are tied to the Marines. The Marines are special. And the President is their direct commander. Trump has chosen wisely and has a loyal team. All others are suspect.
If the coup were successful - as in right now - and we were all busy following Q, instead of turning to our LEOs in our states to resist the coup, that’s what I worry about.
How old is Qanon?
Her use of parentheses and brackets is juvenile.
It’s fun. Like internet murder mystery dinner theater. And it stirs the pot and raises questions. Lots of hokum and diversion. I just enjoy the show.
He’s talking about 60% now. It’s all coming out. Don’t worry.
Could be why Melania is not going to Davos.
This is about as stupid as Sean Hannity’s “tick-tock” BS bait.
Personally I think “Q” is like Nostradamus, somebody who just tosses a bunch of random train-of-thought statements loosely related to current events out there. Then after a major event happens people claim that “Q” had insider knowledge by fitting a couple of his statements related to the topic. However, everybody conveniently forgets the hundreds of statements that were totally off base and meant nothing.
You didn’t get your secret de-coder ring?
Buzz off n00b.
the brackets have significance and indicated an event. for example, he wrote “goodwin. when? [15]” exactly 15 minutes later, Trump wrote a message with the word goodwin on twitter.
He called the NYC bombing attempt as a “failed attempt”, “fireworks”, “BDT- think currency”, “a Bangladeshi”, etc.. The day before....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.