Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Experimental Supersonic Plane Gets Full Funding Under Trump's NASA Budget Proposal
Space.com ^ | February 13, 2018 07:21am ET | Hanneke Weitering, Staff Writer |

Posted on 02/13/2018 11:16:38 AM PST by BenLurkin

Known as the Low-Boom Flight Demonstrator (LBFD), this X-plane is scheduled to make its first test flight as early as 2021 and "would open a new market for U.S. companies to build faster commercial airliners, creating jobs and cutting cross-country flight times in half," the White House budget request states. 

The goal of supersonic aircraft like LBFD is to make commercial airplanes that can fly faster than the speed of sound without generating a loud and obnoxious sonic boom, an ear-splitting noise associated with shock waves generated by an aircraft as it breaks the sound barrier

"Future supersonic aircraft seeking to achieve a low-boom, such as NASA's LBFD, will rely on a swept wing design in order to fly at supersonic speeds without producing a loud sonic boom," NASA officials said. "The swept wing design generally produces crossflow, which is a name for air flow disturbances that runs along the span of the wing, resulting in turbulent flow, increased drag and ultimately higher fuel consumption."

The agency has already been testing preliminary designs of the LBFD X-plane. Last summer, a scale model known as the Quiet Supersonic Transport (QueSST) aircraft was put to the test in a supersonic wind tunnel at NASA's Glenn Research Center in Cleveland. With the financial support allotted by the 2019 budget request, the agency would be able to start building the full-scale LBFD with the goal of beginning flight tests in 2021. 

"This budget maintains a robust investment of $633.9 million to improve air traffic management, make progress integrating unmanned systems into the airspace, and fund an experimental supersonic airplane and increase hypersonics research," NASA Acting Administrator Robert Lightfoot said during the annual State of NASA speech on Monday

(Excerpt) Read more at space.com ...


TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: aerospace; flightdemonstrator; lbfd; lowboom; nasa; spaceplane; sst; supersonic
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 02/13/2018 11:16:38 AM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Now, lets spread the rumor that it’s for Melania to use to go to Europe to get her hair did, and watch the libs spontaneously combust on the spot. lol


2 posted on 02/13/2018 11:20:02 AM PST by V_TWIN (oks like)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Fabulous

Exactly the kind of aeronautics prgm that NASA should be doing!


3 posted on 02/13/2018 11:21:12 AM PST by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
How do they do that?

With one of these?


4 posted on 02/13/2018 11:22:30 AM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

If energy is not going into creating a sonic boom, then perhaps it will be more fuel efficient.


5 posted on 02/13/2018 11:24:02 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (Big governent is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: V_TWIN

6 posted on 02/13/2018 11:29:17 AM PST by SubMareener (Save us from Quarterly Freepathons! Become a MONTHLY DONOR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Low-Boom Flight Demonstrator (LBFD)

BOOM ping!

7 posted on 02/13/2018 11:29:21 AM PST by Flick Lives
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

I’d want one.


8 posted on 02/13/2018 11:31:56 AM PST by wally_bert (I didn't get where I am today by selling ice cream tasting of bookends, pumice stone & West Germany)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Another government Amtrak boondoggle? No, give it to the private sector, like Elon Musk!!


9 posted on 02/13/2018 11:37:49 AM PST by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SgtHooper
NASA HOPES TO FLY YOU FROM COAST TO COAST IN TWO HOURS FLAT WITH THIS BOOM-FREE SUPERSONIC JET


10 posted on 02/13/2018 11:54:35 AM PST by Ol' Dan Tucker (For 'tis the sport to have the engineer hoist with his own petard., -- Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SubMareener

Project Lawn Dart


11 posted on 02/13/2018 11:58:55 AM PST by Darteaus94025 (Can't have a Liberal without a Lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

“”Future supersonic aircraft seeking to achieve a low-boom”


Do we really believe that China, Iran, or Russia care about the sonic boom on their jets used in combat?


12 posted on 02/13/2018 12:03:43 PM PST by Yulee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Dan Tucker

LOL! Except they’ll need to stop at every state along the way, resulting in a 10-hour flight.


13 posted on 02/13/2018 12:03:55 PM PST by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SubMareener

Is this the one that they plan to stack us like cordwood in for passenger service?


14 posted on 02/13/2018 12:04:53 PM PST by Yulee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SubMareener

No windows? No view at all?

Phooey!


15 posted on 02/13/2018 12:12:37 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Yulee; onedoug
You do understand that this is an experimental aircraft, right? You do understand that its purpose is to test certain principles of aerodynamics, right? You do understand that it is not, nor is it intended to be, nor is it advertised as a civilian passenger aircraft or a military combat aircraft. Right?

You do understand that your "objections" are pointless and irrelevant.

Right?

16 posted on 02/13/2018 12:20:11 PM PST by NorthMountain (... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Personally, I, Myself, would much rather prefer a High-Boom-Boom as opposed to a Low-Boom-Boom.


17 posted on 02/13/2018 12:36:42 PM PST by bunkerhill7 ((((("The Second Amendment has no limits on firepower"-NY State Senator Kathleen A. Marchione.")))))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SubMareener

Jart!


18 posted on 02/13/2018 1:23:18 PM PST by Axenolith (Government blows, and that which governs least, blows least...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

19 posted on 02/13/2018 2:00:18 PM PST by al baby (May the Forceps be with you Hi Mom Its a Joke friends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: al baby

Post that to the buffoons who came up with the silly, irrelevant objections.


20 posted on 02/13/2018 2:02:16 PM PST by NorthMountain (... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson