Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

liberals killed e.r.a., not “religious right”
https://www.catholicleague.org ^ | 04/20/2018 | Bill Donohue

Posted on 04/20/2018 2:18:04 PM PDT by heterosupremacist

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: PeterPrinciple

It’s interesting that you say that.

If the liberal of today were “switched” with the libs of yesteryear, “today’s” liberals would just pack the courts and declare it a “right’ already found in the constitution.

No need for those fussy amendments the Founders thought were needed to update the “Living Constitution”


21 posted on 04/20/2018 4:16:34 PM PDT by RedMonqey (" Those who turn their arms in for plowshares will be doing the plowing for those who didnÂ’t.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

The unwritten rule is a 7 year time limit. However, libs these days would do anything to get what they want.


22 posted on 04/20/2018 6:47:12 PM PDT by Finalapproach29er (luke 6:38)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Finalapproach29er
There is no "unwritten rule." Congress either states a specific ratification window or not.

Before the 18th Amendment, there were no ratification windows declared by Congress, so once an amendment was sent to the states for ratification, it was still valid for ratification no matter how many years it took. The 27th Amendment, sent to the states for ratification in 1789 and finally ratified in 1992, is an example.

Starting with the 18th Amendment, however, Congress began declaring ratification windows.

23 posted on 04/20/2018 6:51:34 PM PDT by Publius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...
The idea that women should have the identical rights afforded men was first broached in 1916, and in 1923 the E.R.A. was proposed by the National Women’s Party. Working against it were feminists who objected to identical rights, led by Eleanor Roosevelt. She said women needed special protection against hazardous and “demeaning” occupations, jobs that only men should have to do. Her opposition proved to be successful...
IOW, Eleanor was a feminist. Thanks heterosupremacist.

24 posted on 04/24/2018 3:11:01 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson