Posted on 05/23/2018 12:23:10 PM PDT by God luvs America
Earlier today Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald ruled President Donald Trump is not allowed to block users on twitter who harass him or are rude to him (FR link below). So i looked up the judges office information and called telling the office intern if the judge rules that President Donald Trump must be harassed by people on twitter via her edict then the judge herself is subject to the same harassment over the phone- its called free speech. All four times they hung up on me, claimed i was inappropriate and asked me to stop calling. Her office number is (212) 805-0194. Please make a call, tell them what you think of this ruling and report back. If anyone has a reddit or facebook account please share this.
http://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/judge/Buchwald
Freep link on ruling:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3657596/posts
I will call to thank her. This ruling will result in the end of autonomy for “social media.” Now their Terms of Use can be adjudicated and regulated like other public utilities.
Hanging up on people is basically what Trump wants to do by blocking unwanted Twitter followers imo. Insights welcome.
AWESOME DUDE! libtards are hypocrites arent they?
“On February 12, 1999, Buchwald was nominated by President Bill Clinton to a seat on the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York vacated by Miriam G. Cedarbaum.”
Oh well, I guess it’s not all bad. After all they kept in in the “family, a Socialist Cedarbaum replaced by a Socialist Buchwald! But then, it’s New York, so it’s kinda what you expect!
Wondering if Judgie has a twitter account of her own?
(heh-heh...)
Wondering if Judgie has a twitter account of her own?
(heh-heh...)
I would just not follow it. Let’s see if law enforcement is really going to arrest the president of the united states for blocking users on his PERSONAL twitter account.
Leftists, like Children, are just a hoot to watch grow up.
I guess the problem is, with children there’s still a chance.
Can’t the President simply “mute” people and just ignore these people rather than blocking them entirely?
Bit of a tortured analogy but, whatever it is his right to block unwanted text as it is her right to “hang up on you”.
You have the right to speak......you, however, DO NOT have the right to be heard or be published.
Just shadow ban them like Twitter does to conservatives.
You are a stupid twit! (Not a personal attack, just an observation.) If this ruling applies to the President, it applies to everyone. There is already a Supreme Court ruling (1953) on whether a privat company operating a public facility can restrict free speech.
Just a wild guess but I’m thinking she voted for Killary and is still a little upset about Ms Pants Suit not being in the White House?
You must listen to me. The first amendment says so!
When I called and they hung up on me I kept calling and complained about their hanging up on me. Finally they listened on speaker phone while I made my polite comments about the judge being ill advised in her decision.
Stupid libtards.
We have read Alinsky.
We can now give back as good as we get.
They apparently don’t like it very much.
What’s wrong with hanging up on an a-hole?
need to fight the left the way they fight everyone else...
The next thing we’ll see is a judge issue and injunction against trolls getting the FR Zot!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.