What a kidder! That Chucky. Who says he doesn’t have a sense of humor?
Good luck with that Chuckie.
“That’s a good idea, Chuck. I’ll have to give that some thought. Was there anything else?” - Trump
This is what all the DUmmies were demanding, so Chuck probably just did it so he could score some points with the loony left. I’m sure he didn’t seriously believe the proposal had a chance of going anywhere.
FUChuck Schumer
As. If.
Nothing wrong with asking. Everyone, even President Trump needs a laugh nowI and then.
Need the Goodfellas laughing scene inserted here.
If Clinton won we would be seeing the middle finger from the left as possibly three justices would have been packed in already.
Chuckie must be hitting the expensive weed.
It appears that this is going to be the entire Democrat argument against whoever Trump nominates, “we oppose because...remember Merrick Garland.” That might work with the far left base, but for the rest of the country Merrick Garland is ancient history (if he is even remembered at all). As long as Trump picks a solid nominee, the argument will fall flat on its face and make Democrats look petty.
Former DoJ employee Merrick Garland is a Jamie Gorlick protégé. The Dems want her legacy of destruction to live on.
This Schumer open borders asshole should look in the mirror and ask himself why is he such a stupid, lying, nasty bastard. He’s another one who needs to meet some of his illegal alien, MS13 buddies.
That’s why you’re in the minority, a-hole.
It would be very cool if Trump were to actually nominate Garland then not do anything else at all to support him. When the Senate turns him down then forward the real choice. Of course I am not so sure we could trust most of the Republican Senators to take the hint.
**** Chuck.
As I said to the Army recruiter who tried to get me to get me to reenlist while in ‘Nam for another tour in ‘Nam: “I thought about it, laughed about it, and forgot about it!”
Funny thing is, even the democrats didn’t really want Merrick, he was too moderate for them. Merrick was a gamble by Obama — he hoped the republicans would realize Clinton was going to win, and decide it was better to put Garland on the bench, than to wait and have Hillary pick some far-left whacko judge.
If Clinton had won, there is no chance she would have nominated Merrick to fill the position, and my guess was that if teh republicans had tried to seat Garland after the election, the democrats would have stopped them.