Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Next comes impeachment? Top political prognosticator says Democrats are favored to wipe...
Daily Mail ^ | 7-24-2018 | Geoff Earle

Posted on 07/24/2018 6:49:23 PM PDT by ZagFan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 next last
To: Wyrd bið ful aræd

Not only Maxine as that, But Schiff head of intell, and guess who as judiciary.


61 posted on 07/24/2018 7:40:36 PM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ZagFan

LMAO, Larry Sabato will be wrong AGAIN.


62 posted on 07/24/2018 7:44:16 PM PDT by RooRoobird20 ("Democrats haven't been this angry since Republicans freed the slaves.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZagFan
For what it's worth, Larry predicted in 2016 Hillary would win with 322 electoral votes.

That should be all ANYBODY needs to ignore this one! Thank you.

63 posted on 07/24/2018 7:44:46 PM PDT by ThePatriotsFlag (We are getting even more than we voted for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

Larry is not a pollster.


64 posted on 07/24/2018 7:48:10 PM PDT by Dave W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ZagFan

Sabato predicted Kemp would lose in Georgia today.
Kemp won in a landslide.
Sabato is a maroon.


65 posted on 07/24/2018 7:51:02 PM PDT by weston (As far as I'm concerned, it's Christ or nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox

Out of 50 states, Larry was wrong on 4 states - not too shabby. He had Florida as a toss up along with the two congressional districts - one each in Maine and Nebraska. He did call Ohio and Iowa correctly for Trump, but missed on PA, MI, WI and NC.


66 posted on 07/24/2018 7:53:52 PM PDT by Dave W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

Who needs a map? Larry was wrong on 4 states - NC, PA, MI and WI


67 posted on 07/24/2018 7:55:12 PM PDT by Dave W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ZagFan

Hillary was to be president.


68 posted on 07/24/2018 7:56:36 PM PDT by mulligan (EeThe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: humbleexpert

That is the Daily Mail error. I read the article Drudge linked to today and UVA Center had it correct.


69 posted on 07/24/2018 7:59:21 PM PDT by Dave W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: laplata

Yes, he is biased. I believe he single handedly defeated George Allen in a Virginia Senate race about 10 years ago. He did not hide his disdain for Allen.


70 posted on 07/24/2018 8:01:27 PM PDT by Dave W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

IMPEACHMENT.

RIGHT MOVE.

WRONG PRESIDENT.


71 posted on 07/24/2018 8:03:19 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dave W

Thanks.


72 posted on 07/24/2018 8:03:20 PM PDT by laplata (Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: arthurus
True, Trump can ignore it just like Clinton did when he was impeached. Remember that party they threw on the White House lawn when Clinton was impeached? It was in such poor taste that even the Wash Post condemned it.

But the difference was Clinton was in the last few years of his second term. This is Trump's first term and I'm not certain how you run for reelection as an impeached president.

That is the main reason, the pubs have got to keep the House. This midterm is as important as the 2016 Pres election.

73 posted on 07/24/2018 8:05:22 PM PDT by Dave W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...
Democrats are now 'soft favorites' to take the House, according to an analysis by University of Virginia political scientist Larry Sabato and his team.
IOW, wishful thinking, and he's just another Demagogic Party nitwit who should not be anywhere near a teaching job.

74 posted on 07/24/2018 8:06:14 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ZagFan

I’m not sure I agree the dems will prevail. I am sure however, that if or when the dems retake the house, their 1st order of business will be impeachment and facts won’t be needed.


75 posted on 07/24/2018 8:06:51 PM PDT by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZagFan

UGH Guess I have to hold my nose and vote for Peter Roskam...Again :(

Tho he did support Trump tax reform, prior to the election, his support for Trump was tepid at best...


76 posted on 07/24/2018 8:09:41 PM PDT by Freedom56v2 (#KATE'SWALL Build it Now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound

John Culberson is Texas District 7 which is West Suburban Houston.

About as Republican as you get.

Yeppers


77 posted on 07/24/2018 8:14:45 PM PDT by Dawgreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rustyboots
I agree with you. I think ones like Schumer get it - even Pelosi, who has said talking about impeachment needs to stop.

However, there is a rabid crowd out in the country, who really don't know what the FBI and the DOJ did and really do think Trump won a crooked election (I have talked to some and their ignorance is genuine), or they are upset that it was only an electoral college victory, etc.

The media has lied to the detriment of this country and the Dem grassroots will burn down Washington (not necessarily a bad thing) if the House does not vote for impeachment. That is a huge expectation with these people that I don't think the calmer Dem politicians can tamp down.

It also does not help when Rubio says he thinks the FISA warrant is appropriate.

78 posted on 07/24/2018 8:20:48 PM PDT by Dave W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ZagFan

“Analyst Larry Sabato puts the Democrats’ chances at better than 50 per cent”

uh, daily mail,that’s hardy a ‘wipe out’ ... oh, and that fool Sabato (like the rest of the American punditry) was grotesquely incorrect with their prolongations that Hillary had a 95% chance of winning in 2016 ... so why exactly should these partisan hacks suddenly be considered credible? ... especially since Trump has the U.S. economy in the best shape since Ronald Reagan, the Dems literally have zero platform except hate Trump, and their upstart youngster back-benchers are pushing communism, advocating abolishing law enforcement agencies, and pushing for unchecked illegal immigration from the entire world ... that shite may play in the U.K., but I promise you it does NOT play in fly-over America ...


79 posted on 07/24/2018 8:21:24 PM PDT by catnipman ((Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yossarian

They were below the standards of FR, but are no longer.


80 posted on 07/24/2018 8:23:27 PM PDT by Dave W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson