[EdnaMode]

If a similar case was presented in Judge Judy's court, there wouldn't be anywhere near enough evidence to convict. The witnesses wouldn't even corroborate her story.

[allendale]

How sweet and naïve.

[ClearCase_guy]

people need to slow down and hear the evidence in the Kavanaugh/Ford showdown

Well, as soon as Ford comes up with any evidence, I'll be sure to take this advice.

[nikos1121]

IT would never ever see the light of day in a court of law. It would never pass a grand jury.

Very odd that Judge Judy doesn’t say that.

[cuban leaf]

I don’t take Kavanaugh’s side. I take the side of reason, logic, the law, and the American spirit. Pretent Hillary is the president and Obama is the nominee. I consider both dangerous to the nation, but these charges would be just as absurd in that case.

This is not about Kavanaugh. This is about the wholesale destruction of the process itself.

[Gay State Conservative]

There are only two people who know what did,and didn't happen,thirty eight years ago and they both have a strong motive to lie.The “evidence” I've heard regarding this alleged incident combined with the circumstances surrounding the letter's release and comment as well as Kavanaugh’s obviously strong character lead me to strongly,*strongly* suspect that she's either lying or very delusional indeed.

[djpg]

The problem is that she is talking about judging on the basis of a hearing rather than on the evidence, which does not exist. And on this hearing, there is no presumption of innocence and no right of the accused to confront the accuser.

This hearing should not have been allowed.

[mewzilla]

Prejudge?! There’s not enough there to even do that.

[1Old Pro]

slow down and hear the evidence

We did slow down thanks to Feinstein and the Dems gamesmanship, now for hearing the evidence? Do we really believe Ford will testify Thursday.

[meadsjn]

Assuming that a commie Democrat is lying (or that millions of them are lying), is not pre-judging.

The sun rises in the east; commie Democrats lie.

[No Socialist]

And Judge Judy would give the accuser a huge tongue lashing.

[odawg]

The named witnesses have already come forward and said it never happened. Therefore, we are not prejudging the case without evidence.

[laweeks]

You disappoint me greatly, Judge Judy. I thought you were above all this crap.

[Migraine]

Oh, hell yes I prejudge it. On motive alone I prejudge it.

[chris37]

I don’t recall asking for your opinion, female “judge”.

[Hostage]

The judge is off on this. The scheme played by Democrats is blatantly obvious to any reasonable viewer.

[tomkat]

.. we don't know enough to form an intelligent opinion on who's telling the truth and who's not.

Hey Judy, here's a clue for free:
 here's your ass  (!)
  and third base is over thataway  > > >

[thoughtomator]

We knew enough on the first day to declare with confidence that it was a political hoax, maliciously invented, maliciously promoted.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

...she says people need to slow down and hear the evidence...

What evidence?

[freedom1st]

I’ll take Judge Jeanine Pirro’s advice over Judge Judy’s every time.

[bgill]

We have heard zero evidence from either of the skanks.