Posted on 03/03/2019 3:25:25 PM PST by EdnaMode
Just not necessarily the way you think ...
Bringing a child into the world was her best chance at changing it.
Self justification in evil human pride, is all she has. So empty. She has her reward.
Whatever happened to Birth Control Pills?
Rose admits to murdering a baby. I trust she is punished, eventually.
JoMa
Apparently this woman has never had children despite her claim that most women who have had abortions are in fact mothers. Always wondered what happens to the relationship between a mother who admits to having her pre born conception killed and her surviving children. Wonder what those children really think of their mother. It would be an interesting study if enough women with children made that admission. Suspect some parameters of maternal bonding would be strained. However doubt today’s politically correct psychologists or sociologists would do an honest ,non biased study that just might contradict the liberal narrative. Nevertheless Rose McGowan validates the observation that feminism at its core is a vile anti fertility cult. Downright satanic.
Proverbs 23:7: “As a man thinketh in his heart, so is he.”
Times have flipped upside down. I was in my early twenties before my mother told me she had miscarried before I was born, like it was something shameful.
I don’t believe that she had an abortion to be able to make the world a better place. I DO believe that she probably is overwhelmed by all of the publicity and has unaddressed psychological issues.
Narcissistic Personality Disorder. Having a child means that there is an entity from you and a man that will outlive you and garner more attention from friends and family than you will. In other words, a child represents your own mortality staring you in the face every day. That and the fact that there was a man involved in this representation of a creation that you were just a vessel for.
Best to kill it. Rose McGown is selfish, evil and damned to wander in darkness in her afterlife while the child is held for eternity in the hands of Christ.
You did, Rose. You murdered a child who could have become the next Einstein. Or Jonas Salk. Or Ted Bundy, for that matter. But rest assured, in killing your child, you changed the world.
Just not necessarily the way you think ...
—
Well said.
I guess she never heard of Phyllis Schlafly who raised six children while getting a Law degree and defeating the Equal Rights Amendment.
Talk about improving the world while having children?
She may not have saved the world but she did save the USA!
Having children and teaching them well is the best way to change the world far into the future.
Don’t feel bad. We’ve, well most of us that think, have come to that conclusion and it’s just one of those concepts that is difficult to reconcile. So we don’t talk about it.
While we’re confessing, I’ll share one of mine. I don’t mind the idea and practice of sanctuary cities. Why? Because none of them are geographically near me and I assume the existence of them draw, like a magnet, the type of illegal immigrants that need their lawlessness overlooked. Although, in a perfect world I wish the didn’t exist. But since they do.... Sorry.
Not sorry.
She certainly “changed the world” for at least one human being.
If you gave the baby up for adoption, that is changing the world.
Throwing the baby away is not.
With an upbringing by a mother like Rose, it could also have turned out to be the next Hitler or Mengele
Of course, being responsible didn’t seem to be on the table for Rose, or she wouldn’t have had to make any “choice”
Poor thing has no idea that a baby can change the world.
Yes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.