Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U. S. Navy Fleet Review, New York City, 1934 (Original film footage)
YouTube ^ | 05-25-2019 | Speed Graphic Film and Video

Posted on 05/25/2019 9:50:30 AM PDT by NRx

In June of 1934, a United States Naval Review brought over 100 ships and more than 40,000 sailors to New York Harbor. Movietone News covered the event extensively. (original film footage much w/sound appx 18 mins)

(Excerpt) Read more at youtu.be ...


TOPICS: History
KEYWORDS: fleet; history; navy; newyork

1 posted on 05/25/2019 9:50:30 AM PDT by NRx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NRx

Thanks Very good and Patriotic this Memorial Weekend, passed on to all the Family.


2 posted on 05/25/2019 10:28:21 AM PDT by easternsky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NRx

That was so much fun to watch.


3 posted on 05/25/2019 10:44:23 AM PDT by Retain Mike ( Sat Cong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NRx
Notice, when LaGuardia boarded the USS Pennsylvania he returned the Admiral's and Company's salute. Since he was NOT in uniform, he did so by removing his hat and placing his right hand over his heart while "Ruffles and Flourishes" were played.

Can anyone tell me when it became proper for dignitaries, including Presidents, to use hand salutes while in mufti?

4 posted on 05/25/2019 10:58:26 AM PDT by Roccus (When you talk to a politician...ANY politician...always say, "Remember Ceausescu")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Roccus

The first time I can think of is Reagan. I seem to remember some story of him asking an officer near him if he should return a solute and the officer saying something like “No one’s going to tell you you cant”.


5 posted on 05/25/2019 11:16:35 AM PDT by CrazyIvan (A gentleman arms himself for the protection of others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Roccus

You have raised one of my pet peeves. And it is one of the very few subjects where I am critical of the Gipper. It was Ronald Reagan who broke with tradition and etiquette by returning military salutes as a civilian. All of his predecessors, including some who had been professional military men before becoming president, did not do this. I think it was a mistake and has contributed to the militarization of the presidency to the point where many people now refer to the POTUS as “the Commander in Chief.”


6 posted on 05/25/2019 11:24:56 AM PDT by NRx (A man of honor passes his father's civilization to his son without surrendering it to strangers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NRx

He is the “Commander in Chief”.


7 posted on 05/25/2019 11:28:50 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NRx; CrazyIvan

Thank you both.

I thought it may have been President Reagan, but wasn’t sure.

NRx; It’s a pet peeve of mine also and I think it looks undignified, absurd and childish.


8 posted on 05/25/2019 11:32:45 AM PDT by Roccus (When you talk to a politician...ANY politician...always say, "Remember Ceausescu")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: trisham

That’s one of the constitutional functions of his office. It is not his job title. He is the President of the United States. And it is also worth noting that when he receives military salutes, including on state occasions a 21 gun salute, it is not the CnC that they are saluting, it is the head of state. The founding fathers were absolutely adamant that the presidency was to be a civilian office.


9 posted on 05/25/2019 11:33:26 AM PDT by NRx (A man of honor passes his father's civilization to his son without surrendering it to strangers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NRx

Exactly.


10 posted on 05/25/2019 11:34:07 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NRx

Thank you so much, just forwarded to my old Navy buddies.


11 posted on 05/25/2019 11:36:37 AM PDT by kenmcg (tHE WHOLE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NRx
Hmmm... Wonderful video... I was about 8-months old at the time, so didn't get to see this in person...

Naturally, like everyone else, I'm shocked at the total lack of diversity (gender, racial, sexual preference) exhibited by both the Navy and the NYC citizenry... /s

You would have to go back many decades to find a time when NYC loved their Nation's military...

12 posted on 05/25/2019 12:07:33 PM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is Sam Adams now that we desperately need him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SuperLuminal

“You would have to go back many decades to find a time when NYC loved their Nation’s military...”

_________________________________________________________________________________________

I find it aqmazing how FReepers can know so much about NYC and yet know so little.

Veteran’s Day Parade NYC 2018

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R0H_P0J0Vao


13 posted on 05/25/2019 4:15:39 PM PDT by Roccus (When you talk to a politician...ANY politician...always say, "Remember Ceausescu")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NRx

The crews looked too male and too white. Where’s the diversity that shows our strength?


14 posted on 05/25/2019 8:28:45 PM PDT by damper99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NRx

Very cool!

Was this the original Fleet Week?


15 posted on 05/25/2019 8:35:27 PM PDT by Jane Long (Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Roccus

Nice....but, notice the streets weren’t lined, with patriotic citizens, ala 1934.

And, in 1934 NYC didn’t hold Queer Parades.

Just noting the differences between the 1934 Naval Fleet film and the one you posted.


16 posted on 05/25/2019 8:37:30 PM PDT by Jane Long (Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Roccus

You’re proud of that? No one was in attendance except the parade participants. What a disgrace. It’s worse than I thought.


17 posted on 05/25/2019 8:44:27 PM PDT by sparklite2 (Don't mind me. I'm just a contrarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: NRx

Interesting to see all the “four pipers” and especially the cage masts that were still on the battleships. Originally, it was to lessen the vibration for the gun directors but they didn’t hold up well in heavy seas and they went to the more solid tripod masts instead.

A nice trip down memory lane.


18 posted on 05/26/2019 8:30:11 AM PDT by Oatka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson